Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Print on Demand
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Print on Demand
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Principles of Grapevine Canopy Microclimate Manipulation with Implications for Yield and Quality. A Review

Richard E. Smart
Am J Enol Vitic.  1985  36: 230-239  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1985.36.3.230
Richard E. Smart
Ruakura Soil and Plant Research Station, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This paper develops concepts of grapevine canopy microclimate by considering how the canopy presence can alter the climate. Solar radiation levels are particularly affected due to high absorption by leaves. The radiation environment of canopy exteriors is shown to depend on vineyard geometry and ambient radiation levels. The number of leaf layers within grapevine canopies determines the degree of shading, and an optimal canopy density of about three leaf layers is advocated. Three means of altering canopy microclimate are discussed: shoot number control, vigor control, and use of training systems. The interaction between row spacing, shoot number, vigor, and leaf angle in affecting canopy density is illustrated. Within-canopy shading is promoted by high shoot numbers per hectare, wide row spacing, high vine vigor, and vertical leaves. Examples are given of the effect of reduced vigor on improving canopy microclimate. An analysis of different training systems shows that shading is reduced with narrow rows or by canopy division. The review concludes by considering the effects of canopy microclimate on yield, fruit and wine composition, and offers points for further research.

  • Received January 1985.
  • Copyright 1985 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 36 Issue 3

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Principles of Grapevine Canopy Microclimate Manipulation with Implications for Yield and Quality. A Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Principles of Grapevine Canopy Microclimate Manipulation with Implications for Yield and Quality. A Review
Richard E. Smart
Am J Enol Vitic.  1985  36: 230-239  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1985.36.3.230
Richard E. Smart
Ruakura Soil and Plant Research Station, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Principles of Grapevine Canopy Microclimate Manipulation with Implications for Yield and Quality. A Review
Richard E. Smart
Am J Enol Vitic.  1985  36: 230-239  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1985.36.3.230
Richard E. Smart
Ruakura Soil and Plant Research Station, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Sensory and Chemical Characterization of Phenolic Polymers from Red Wine Obtained by Gel Permeation Chromatography
  • N, P, and K Supply to Pinot noir Grapevines: Impact on Vine Nutrient Status, Growth, Physiology, and Yield
  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Print on Demand

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2025 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire