Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Response of Okanagan Riesling Vines to Training System and Simulated Mechanical Pruning

A. G. Reynolds
Am J Enol Vitic.  1988  39: 205-212  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1988.39.3.205
A. G. Reynolds
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Summerland, B.C., Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Ten-year-old Okanagan Riesling vines were subjected over three growing seasons to two pruning strategies (18 nodes/m row and simulated mechanical pruning; SMP) within each of three training systems (midwire bilateral cordon, MBC; Hudson River Umbrella, HRU; and Lenz Moser, LM). SMP reduced vine size, cluster weight, berries/cluster, and berry weight but led to substantial increases in shoots/vine and yield. Titratable acidity (TA), °Brix, and Botrytis-infected fruit were also reduced by SMP. Shoots/vine, yield, and vine size were maximized by MBC training; however, °Brix was reduced, TA and pH were elevated, and Botrytis-infected fruit increased when combined with SMP. Point quadrat analysis indicated MBC to have the densest canopy containing the greatest number of leaf contacts, while this technique combined with photometric measurements revealed MBC to possess minimal cluster exposure. SMP vines tended to have fewer canopy contacts than their manually pruned counterparts. Wine quality and aroma intensity were best in wines from manually pruned HRU-trained fruit. SMP tended to reduce wine quality compared to manual pruning.

  • training system
  • mechanical pruning
  • pruning
  • canopy management
  • Okanagan Riesling
  • Received November 1987.
  • Copyright 1988 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 39 Issue 3

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response of Okanagan Riesling Vines to Training System and Simulated Mechanical Pruning
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Response of Okanagan Riesling Vines to Training System and Simulated Mechanical Pruning
A. G. Reynolds
Am J Enol Vitic.  1988  39: 205-212  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1988.39.3.205
A. G. Reynolds
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Summerland, B.C., Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Response of Okanagan Riesling Vines to Training System and Simulated Mechanical Pruning
A. G. Reynolds
Am J Enol Vitic.  1988  39: 205-212  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1988.39.3.205
A. G. Reynolds
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Summerland, B.C., Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
  • Leaf Blade versus Petiole Analysis for Nutritional Diagnosis of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo
  • Mechanical Canopy and Crop-Load Management of Pinot gris in a Warm Climate
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2026 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire