Abstract
A three-year study was conducted to compare three Thompson Seedless clones, 1A, Urla-HT, and Enns-HT. 1A is a University of California non-registered selection with mild grapevine leafroll; Urla-HT and Enns-HT are Turkish and California selections, respectively, heat-treated and registered virus-free. 1A and Urla-HT were compared with both cane- and long-spur pruning to determine if Urla-HT was more fruitful with spur pruning as reported. Enns-HT was compared under cane pruning only. Orthogonal comparisons of 1A vs. Urla-HT (all pruning treatments) and 1A vs. Enns-HT (cane pruning only) found 1A to produce higher raisin yields than Urla-HT or Enns-HT. This was attributed to the heavier berries and clusters of 1A. Additionally, 1A was more fruitful than Urla-HT, a contradiction to Urla's reported high fruitfulness characteristics. The larger vine size of Enns-HT confirmed field observations of vine growth but was accompanied by lower productivity as compared to 1A. The better performance of 1A, in spite of virus presence, suggests possible genetic differences in these clonal comparisons.
- Received April 1992.
- Copyright 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
Sign in for ASEV members
ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.
Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers
Log in using your username and password
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.