Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Comparisons of Thompson Seedless Clones for Raisin Production

L. Peter Christensen, Mary L. Bianchi
Am J Enol Vitic.  1994  45: 150-154  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1994.45.2.150
L. Peter Christensen
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, and Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary L. Bianchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A three-year study was conducted to compare three Thompson Seedless clones, 1A, Urla-HT, and Enns-HT. 1A is a University of California non-registered selection with mild grapevine leafroll; Urla-HT and Enns-HT are Turkish and California selections, respectively, heat-treated and registered virus-free. 1A and Urla-HT were compared with both cane- and long-spur pruning to determine if Urla-HT was more fruitful with spur pruning as reported. Enns-HT was compared under cane pruning only. Orthogonal comparisons of 1A vs. Urla-HT (all pruning treatments) and 1A vs. Enns-HT (cane pruning only) found 1A to produce higher raisin yields than Urla-HT or Enns-HT. This was attributed to the heavier berries and clusters of 1A. Additionally, 1A was more fruitful than Urla-HT, a contradiction to Urla's reported high fruitfulness characteristics. The larger vine size of Enns-HT confirmed field observations of vine growth but was accompanied by lower productivity as compared to 1A. The better performance of 1A, in spite of virus presence, suggests possible genetic differences in these clonal comparisons.

  • grapes
  • raisins
  • Thompson Seedless
  • clones
  • Received April 1992.
  • Copyright 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 45 Issue 2

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparisons of Thompson Seedless Clones for Raisin Production
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Comparisons of Thompson Seedless Clones for Raisin Production
L. Peter Christensen, Mary L. Bianchi
Am J Enol Vitic.  1994  45: 150-154  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1994.45.2.150
L. Peter Christensen
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, and Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary L. Bianchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Comparisons of Thompson Seedless Clones for Raisin Production
L. Peter Christensen, Mary L. Bianchi
Am J Enol Vitic.  1994  45: 150-154  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1994.45.2.150
L. Peter Christensen
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, and Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary L. Bianchi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Predicting Berry Quality Attributes in cv. Xarel·lo Rain-Fed Vineyards Using Narrow-Band Reflectance-Based Indices
  • Grapevine Crown Gall Suppression Using Biological Control and Genetic Engineering: A Review of Recent Research
  • Effect of Winery Yeast Lees on Touriga Nacional Red Wine Color and Tannin Evolution
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2025 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire