Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Micropropagation of the Grapevine: Results of 10 Years of Experiments in the Champagne Vineyard and Results of the First Vinifications

A. Deloire, M. Charpentier, G. Berlioz, A. Colin, G. Gimonnet
Am J Enol Vitic. January 1995 46: 571-578; published ahead of print January 01, 1995
A. Deloire
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Charpentier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Berlioz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Colin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
G. Gimonnet
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The traditional technique of grapevine propagation through woody grafting multiplication could be usefully complemented by the in vitro micro-propagation process and by the green grafting method. In this work, the possibilities and limits of the in vitro propagation process were studied. About two hectares of experimental in vitro grapevines were planted in a Champagne vineyard, and their viticultural and enological characteristics were studied over a period of 10 years. Compared to control vines, no morphological difference and no phylloxera damage were observed on the 41B (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas x Vitis berlandieri) and 333EM (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon x Vitis berlandieri) from in vitro propagated vines, planted in the field in 1985, after the plants had reached eight years of age. However, some leaves and one-year-old stem of in vitro propagated Chardonnay and Pinot noir vines showed some vegetative differences compared to the control vines. As a consequence of poor flower differentiation, the in vitro grapevine production was about 50% lower than the production from control vines for the four first years, but the developed berries were normal (shape, size, maturity). All abnormal differences progressively disappeared after seven years. In vitro and control fermentation and tasting results from 1989 to 1993 were similar. No significant preferences in Chardonnay and Pinot noir base wines from micro-propagation and control grapevines were detected by a panel of trained judges.

  • grapevine propagation
  • in vitro propagation
  • Copyright 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 46 Issue 4

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Micropropagation of the Grapevine: Results of 10 Years of Experiments in the Champagne Vineyard and Results of the First Vinifications
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Micropropagation of the Grapevine: Results of 10 Years of Experiments in the Champagne Vineyard and Results of the First Vinifications
A. Deloire, M. Charpentier, G. Berlioz, A. Colin, G. Gimonnet
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1995  46: 571-578;  published ahead of print January 01, 1995

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Micropropagation of the Grapevine: Results of 10 Years of Experiments in the Champagne Vineyard and Results of the First Vinifications
A. Deloire, M. Charpentier, G. Berlioz, A. Colin, G. Gimonnet
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1995  46: 571-578;  published ahead of print January 01, 1995
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Sensory and Chemical Characterization of Phenolic Polymers from Red Wine Obtained by Gel Permeation Chromatography
  • N, P, and K Supply to Pinot noir Grapevines: Impact on Vine Nutrient Status, Growth, Physiology, and Yield
  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Temecula Wines Wonderful Nurseries J. Lohr Silverado Nuveen Natural Capital

AJEV Content

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2022 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire