Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Yield and Berry Composition of Five Vitis Cultivars as Affected by Rupestris Stem Pitting Virus

Andrew G. Reynolds, W. S. Lanterman, D. A. Wardle
Am J Enol Vitic. January 1997 48: 449-458; published ahead of print January 01, 1997 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1997.48.4.449
Andrew G. Reynolds
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Station, Summerland, BC V0H 1Z0
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
W. S. Lanterman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
D. A. Wardle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Rooted cuttings of Kerner (Vitis vinifera), Michurinetz (V. amurensis X), and Okanagan Riesling (V. labrus- cana X), either virus-free or infected with Rupestris stem pitting virus (RSPV), were planted in 1987 in a randomized block experiment at Summerland, British Columbia (arid continental climate). Also, virus-free and RSPV-infected plants Madeleine Sylvaner, and Ortega (both V. vinifera) were planted in a completely randomized experiment at Saanichton Plant Quarantine Station, Sidney, BC (cool maritime climate). Yield components were not affected at the Summerland site, but weight of cane prunings were reduced in RSPV- infected Michurinetz vines in 1995-96. RSPV also lowered yield and clusters per vine of both cultivars in 1994 at Sidney, along with Ortega weight of cane prunings (1993 and 1994) and berry weight (1994). Berry titratable acidity (TA) at harvest was reduced at both sites in RSPV-infected vines, and pH was concomitantly increased. TA was consistently lower and the pH was always higher in the RSPV berries during veraison to harvest at Summerland. No apparent negative impact of RSPV was observed except delayed soluble solids (°Brix) accumulation in RSPV-infected Kerner and Okanagan Riesling vines at Summerland in 1991, and lower °Brix in Ortega RSPV berries at Sidney in 1993. In some seasons, fruit composition differences between virus-free and RSPV vines disappeared close to commercial maturity, but lower TA and higher pH persisted until harvest at the Summerland site in 1993. RSPV-infected vines at Sidney exhibited slightly delayed budburst in 1988-91 and 1994, but not 1993. These results suggest that RSPV has no major impact on grapevine growth and yield, and may advance fruit maturity in terms of TA and pH.

  • viruses
  • stem pitting
  • plant quarantine
  • Received October 1996.
  • Copyright 1997 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 48 Issue 4

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Yield and Berry Composition of Five Vitis Cultivars as Affected by Rupestris Stem Pitting Virus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Yield and Berry Composition of Five Vitis Cultivars as Affected by Rupestris Stem Pitting Virus
Andrew G. Reynolds, W. S. Lanterman, D. A. Wardle
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1997  48: 449-458;  published ahead of print January 01, 1997 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1997.48.4.449

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Yield and Berry Composition of Five Vitis Cultivars as Affected by Rupestris Stem Pitting Virus
Andrew G. Reynolds, W. S. Lanterman, D. A. Wardle
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1997  48: 449-458;  published ahead of print January 01, 1997 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1997.48.4.449
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • N, P, and K Supply to Pinot noir Grapevines: Impact on Vine Nutrient Status, Growth, Physiology, and Yield
  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
  • Leaf Blade versus Petiole Analysis for Nutritional Diagnosis of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire