Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Technical Brief

Comparison of Analytical Methods for Prediction of Prefermentation Nutritional Status of Grape Juice

Barry H. Gump, Bruce W. Zoecklein, Kenneth C. Fugelsang, Robert S. Whiton
Am J Enol Vitic.  2002  53: 325-329  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2002.53.4.325
Barry H. Gump
Department of Viticulture and Enology, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce W. Zoecklein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth C. Fugelsang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. Whiton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Five methods for evaluating nitrogen status were compared using 70 Cabernet Sauvignon juice samples: nitrogen by o-phthaldialdehyde (NOPA), arginine NOPA, enzymatic ammonia, Formol, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Parallel recovery studies using model solutions of various amino acids and ammonia, presented singly and in combination, were also conducted. The results from two fruit-processing methods were compared using immature and mature berries. NOPA measurements were significantly higher in mature, pressed whole berry-derived samples, compared with homogenized juice. Adjustment of formaldehyde pH prior to analysis was found to be critical to consistency of the Formol method. Average amino acid recoveries for the Formol titration ranged from 82 to 99%. Average recovery for proline was 16.9 ± 0.4%. Ammonium nitrogen was also recovered (84 ± 3%) in the Formol procedure. Formol results trended significantly with NOPA. The correlation coefficient between Formol and NOPA plus NH4+ was 0.87, with Formol values being higher. The average deviation between the Formol and HPLC plus NH4+ and between the NOPA plus NH4+ and HPLC plus NH4+ was 7.3%.

  • Assimilable nitrogen
  • Formol
  • HPLC
  • NOPA
  • FAN
  • YANC
  • amino acids
  • NH4+

Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the following agencies for their assistance in funding this research: Virginia Winegrowers Advisory Board, California Agricultural Technology Institute, California Competive Grants Program and the American Vineyard Foundation. Additional thank you to Sandy Brown, Robert Henry, Dan Musso, Jeremy Weintraub, Lawrence Herder, Steve Marko, and John Giannini.

  • Copyright 2002 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 53 Issue 4

  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Analytical Methods for Prediction of Prefermentation Nutritional Status of Grape Juice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Comparison of Analytical Methods for Prediction of Prefermentation Nutritional Status of Grape Juice
Barry H. Gump, Bruce W. Zoecklein, Kenneth C. Fugelsang, Robert S. Whiton
Am J Enol Vitic.  2002  53: 325-329  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2002.53.4.325
Barry H. Gump
Department of Viticulture and Enology, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce W. Zoecklein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth C. Fugelsang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. Whiton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Comparison of Analytical Methods for Prediction of Prefermentation Nutritional Status of Grape Juice
Barry H. Gump, Bruce W. Zoecklein, Kenneth C. Fugelsang, Robert S. Whiton
Am J Enol Vitic.  2002  53: 325-329  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2002.53.4.325
Barry H. Gump
Department of Viticulture and Enology, California State University, Fresno, CA 93740
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce W. Zoecklein
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth C. Fugelsang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert S. Whiton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Effects of High Temperatures on the Efficacy of Potassium Polyaspartate for Tartaric Stabilization in Wines
  • Inhibition of Polyphenol Oxidase by Quercetin Derivatives in Grape Skin
  • Environmental Impact of Wine Aging Process in Oak Barrels in Wineries of La Rioja (Spain)
Show more Technical Brief

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2026 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire