Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Influence of Enological Practices on Ochratoxin A Concentration in Wine

Angelita Gambuti, Daniela Strollo, Alessandro Genovese, Maurizio Ugliano, Alberto Ritieni, Luigi Moio
Am J Enol Vitic.  2005  56: 155-162  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2005.56.2.155
Angelita Gambuti
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Strollo
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Genovese
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Ugliano
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Ritieni
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Luigi Moio
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: l.moio{at}unifg.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The effects of several enological practices on ochratoxin A (OTA) concentration in wines were evaluated. Analysis of OTA was performed by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after immunoaffinity cleanup. Higher toxin levels were found in red wines (0.017 to 0.050 μg/L) than white wines (0.006 to 0.022 μg/L). Intensive pressing of pomace, prolonged drying of grapes, and storage in partially empty tanks increased OTA contamination of wines. Poor winery sanitation practice was the primary source of OTA contamination, as wines from contaminated wineries had the highest OTA values (0.130 to 1.300 μg/L). Filtration through a 10-μm membrane and heating on hot plates at 55°C did not cause a significant decrease in the toxin level. An 80% decrease of OTA was observed after wine filtration through a 0.45-μm membrane (p < 0.05). Eleven enological fining agents were tested to study their ability to remove OTA from wine. Enological decolorizing carbon removed (at 30 g/hL) up to 72% of OTA. The Freundlich isotherm was used to model OTA adsorption on carbon. Results showed that carbon had selective adsorption (KF = 3.172 (mg/g)/(mg/L)0.8474), but it did not affect polyphenol content and color of red wine. Nevertheless, a decrease of key sensory odorants of wine, such as 3-methylbutyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, and geraniol, was observed.

  • wine
  • ochratoxin A
  • fining agents
  • carbon

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a toxin produced by the fungi Aspergillus ochraceus, Penicillium verrucosum, Aspergillus carbonarius, and Aspergillus niger (Ciegler 1972, Pitt 1987, Heenam et al. 1998) and was first identified in cereals and derived products in South Africa in 1965 (van der Merwe et al. 1965). It is shown to be nephrotoxic, hepatotoxic, teratogenic, and immunotoxic in several species. Moreover, this mycotoxin is suspected as a factor in the etiology of Balkan endemic nephropathy (Vrabcheva et al. 2000) and the cause of kidney tumors in pigs and rats (Munro et al. 1974, WHO 1996). In 1993, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC 1993) classified OTA as a possible carcinogen in humans. Ochratoxin A has been reported in human milk, blood serum, and plasma (Zimmerli and Dick 1995, Ueno et al. 1998), suggesting continuous uptake by consumers. Studies in different food matrices revealed that high concentrations of OTA are frequently found in cereals, coffee, cocoa, nuts, and dried fruits (Pohland et al. 1992, FAO 1999). Significant concentrations of OTA in beer and wine have been reported (Scott and Kanhere 1995, Zimmerli and Dick 1996). The occurrence of OTA in wine has been mainly associated with poor winery sanitation, contributing to the development of molds in the winery and the consequent contamination of grapes following harvest (Zimmerli and Dick 1996). Rapid processing of harvested grapes and improved sanitation practices may reduce contamination (Italian Ministerial Decree, 1 April 2000). Nevertheless, there is little information on the influence of different winemaking practices on OTA concentration in wines, although the fining of red wine may reduce OTA levels (Dumeau and Trione 2000, Castellari et al. 2001). However, as fining causes a reduction in the concentration of some important wine constituents such as polyphenols and aroma compounds (Lubbers et al. 1993, Castellari et al. 2001), the removal of OTA by fining agents requires further investigation.

The primary purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of prolonged drying of grapes, pressing of pomace, storage in partially empty tanks, microfiltration, and heating on OTA concentration. Moreover, the possible “curative” efficiency of fining treatments on wines contaminated by high concentrations of OTA was investigated by evaluating both the ability of different fining agents to remove the toxin and the simultaneous reduction of polyphenols and aroma compounds associated with each fining agent.

Materials and Methods

Wines.

Seven 100-kg lots of Falanghina (Vitis vinifera L.) grapes from different vineyards located in the Taburno DOC area (Campania region, Italy) were used for the production of white wines. Each lot was processed separately in a small-scale experimental winery. Grapes were de-stemmed, crushed, and 10 g/hL of potassium metabisulfite was added. The crushed grapes were pressed into musts, 2.0 g/hL of pectic enzyme (Lallzyme HC, Lallemand Inc., Castel d’Azzano, Italy) was added, and the mixture allowed to settle for 24 hr at 14°C. After clarification, musts were racked and inoculated with 30 g/hL of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain 71 B (Lallemand). Fermentations took place in 140-L stainless steel tanks at 14°C. At the end of alcoholic fermentation (residual sugars <2.0 g/L), wines were racked with 8.0 g/hL of potassium metabisulfite, cold-stabilized for one month at 10°C, and bottled. Four white wines were obtained from Falanghina grapes left to dry for two months in an aerated room, adopting the winemaking procedure previously described.

Seven 100-kg lots of Aglianico (Vitis vinifera L.) grapes from the Taburno DOC area were used for the production of red wines. Grapes were destemmed and crushed. The must was treated with 6.0 g/hL of potassium metabisulfite. Fermentation started with indigenous yeast and the cap was immersed twice a day. Fermentation temperature was 26°C and maceration of the pomace lasted 10 days. Successively, the pomace was pressed (~8 Atm), giving ~65 L of wine. The effect of pressing on the concentration of OTA in wine was evaluated on four Aglianico red wines produced with the same red winemaking procedure previously described, except that must pressing was carried out at ~80 Atm.

In order to evaluate the influence of filtration and heating, three samples of Aglianico wine (4 L each) were divided into four aliquots. The first aliquot was filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane (Beco-Membran’PF Begerow, Milano, Italy), the second was filtered through a 10-μm membrane (SEITZ-PREcart PPII, Scott Labs, Petaluma, CA), and the third was heated on a hot plate at 55°C before being filtered through a 10-μm membrane (SEITZ-PREcart PPII). The fourth aliquot was the control.

In order to evaluate the influence of hygienic conditions of the winery on wine OTA contamination, seven Aglianico red wines and seven Falanghina white wines were provided by local farmers producing wine for their own consumption. These wineries have the following features: the presence of molds in containers, high storage temperature (up to 28–30°C in summer), and generally poor sanitation (premises were not perfectly clean).

OTA extraction and HPLC analysis.

Ochratoxin A was extracted from 10 mL of wine and purified following an immunoaffinity clean-up procedure (Visconti et al. 1999). Quantification of OTA was performed by HPLC, as described by Visconti et al. (1999). HPLC analysis was carried out with a Shimadzu apparatus (Shimadzu Italy, Milan) consisting of a LC-10 ADVP, a SCL-10A system controller, two LC-A pumps, a fluorescence detector, an injection system full-loop Rheodyne model 7725 (Rheodyne, Cotati, CA) and equipped with a Bio-Sil C18 column (150 x 4.6 mm, 5.0-mm particle diameter) (Bio-Rad, Milan, Italy) with an injection loop of 100 μL.

Quantification of OTA was carried out by comparison to an external standard curve constructed by injecting six standard solutions containing OTA at concentrations from 0.50 to 10 μg/L. The calibration curve equation had a slope of 45730.53 ± 343.19 and r2 = 0.9997. The limit of detection (signal-to-noise ratio 3:1) was 0.05 μg/L and was obtained by injecting standard solutions at increasing OTA concentrations (from 0.025 to 0.5 μg/L). The limit of quantitation (signal-to-noise ratio 10:1) was 0.5 μg/L. This amount did not take into account the 20-fold concentration of OTA in the wine extract as a consequence of immunoaffinity chromatography. The extraction procedure and HPLC analysis of each sample was carried out in triplicate.

The precision of the method used was tested by 10 replicate analyses on a white wine sample containing OTA at a concentration of 0.006 μg/L and a red wine sample containing OTA at 0.066 μg/L. The coefficient of variation was less than 6.7%, demonstrating good repeatability of the HPLC analysis. To validate the method, wine containing OTA at a concentration of 0.006 μg/L was fortified with OTA at concentrations of 5.0, 3.0, and 2.0 μg/L. Each fortified sample was divided into four aliquots and submitted to the extraction procedure and HPLC analysis. The recoveries were 77.75 ± 2.59%, 82.25 ± 1.71%, and 83.75 ± 1.89% at 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 μg/L, respectively.

Fining agents and clarification.

Eleven fining agents were used at a dosage of 50 g/hL: natural polysaccharide, cellulose ester, PVPP (N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone homopolimer), cellulose fiber, rind yeast, silica gel, bentonite, deodorant carbon, decolorizing carbon, high mesoporosity carbon, and high decolorizing carbon (all provided by Perdomini, Verona, Italy). Clarification experiments were performed as follows. Red wine (500 mL) was fortified with OTA at a concentration of 10 μg/L and a fining agent was added to fortified wine. The solution was mixed for 3 hr at room temperature and filtered through a 12-μm membrane (Schleicher & Schuell AE 100, Keene, NH). The experiment conducted with bentonite was performed as follows: bentonite was dispersed in water (1:20) overnight, then added to the wine sample (500 mL), mixed for 5 min at room temperature, and left to flocculate until complete sedimentation. The supernatant was filtered through a 12-μm membrane (Schleicher & Schuell AE 100).

For the experiments with different concentrations of enological carbon with decolorizing activity, samples of red wine containing pure OTA at concentrations of 5.0 μg/L were added to enological carbon at 5.0, 10, 20, and 30 g/hL, mixed, and, after 30 min, filtered on a 12-μm membrane. Each fining agent and clarification experiment was carried out in triplicate.

Polyphenol and volatile fraction analyses.

Total polyphenol content was carried out by Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric analysis as described by Singleton and Rossi (1965), catechins as described by Margheri and Falcesi (1972), color intensity and tone as described by Glories (1984), and anthocyanins and tannin content as described by Ribereau-Gayon and Stonestreet (1965). Extraction and analysis of volatile compounds was performed as described by Moio et al. (2004).

Statistical analysis.

Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test were used to interpret differences in means, if any, at the 95% confidence level. Regression analysis was carried out to evaluate the effect of increasing dosages of carbon on wine OTA concentration. Elaborations were carried out by means of JMP 4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

Effects of enological practices on OTA.

Ochratoxin A levels in wines and the effect of some enological factors are shown in Table 1⇓. Concentration ranges for OTA were 0.006 to 0.022 μg/L and 0.017 to 0.050 μg/L for white and red wines, respectively. White wines obtained from grapes left to dry for two months had OTA levels more than two times higher than white wines obtained from grapes at full maturity. Intensive pressing of the pomace increased OTA concentrations in red wines, resulting in wines with a concentration of toxin approximately four times higher than red wines traditionally obtained. Analysis of homemade wines revealed that winery sanitation was the main factor influencing OTA contamination of wine. Wines from contaminated wineries showed higher OTA concentrations, ranging between 0.130 and 0.240 μg/L for white wines and 0.200 and 1.351 μg/L for red wines.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

The effect of vinification practice on ochratoxin A concentration (μg/L) in white and red wines.

Following filtration, a decrease in the toxin content of about 80% was observed in red wine samples filtered through the 0.45-μm membrane (p < 0.05). Treatments filtered through the 10-μm membrane did not show a significant decrease in the toxin (p < 0.05). Regarding the pasteurization of wine, heating on hot plates at 55°C followed by microfiltration through 10-μm membranes did not affect OTA concentration (p > 0.05).

Adsorptive capacity of fining agents.

Among products evaluated for the clarifying treatment of contaminated wines, only enological carbon reduced OTA concentration (Figure 1⇓). Four different types of carbon were used: (1) deodorant; (2) decolorizing with a medium activity and activated by H3PO4; (3) decolorizing with a medium-high activity; and (4) decolorizing with a high activity and activated by H3PO4. The addition of deodorant carbon to wine at 50 g/hL, used in enology to remove abnormal odors, decreased the initial concentration of OTA by 68%. The other three types of enological decolorizing carbon showed a 96 and 98% decrease of initial concentration under similar conditions.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1

Effect of different fining agents on OTA concentration in red wine. Error bars represent the standard deviation of replicate measurements.

The effect of increasing dosage of decolorizing carbon on OTA content is reported in Table 2⇓. At a carbon concentration of 10 g/hL, OTA decreased to 46% of the initial level; for samples treated at 30 g/hL, OTA decreased to 72% of initial level. As expected, OTA concentration decreased as the carbon concentration increased. Polyphenol content and other color parameters of the samples treated with activated carbon at concentrations of 5.0 to 30 g/hL were not significant compared with the controls (Table 2⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Effect of decolorizing carbon on OTA concentration, polyphenol concentration, and color intensity. Each wine analyzed in triplicate.

The effect of carbon with high decolorizing activity on volatile compounds in the experimental wines was also studied (Table 3⇓). Fifty-four compounds belonging to the chemical classes of alcohols (20), esters (11), acids (8), aldehydes (2), phenols (3), sulfur compounds (3), ketones (1), and furanes (1) were identified and measured. Addition of carbon at 10 g/hL caused a significant decrease in the concentrations of some principal wine volatiles such as 3-methyl-1-butanol, geraniol, 2-phenylethanol, 3-methylbutyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, and octanoic and decanoic acids. For many of these compounds, such as ethyl esters, acetates, and geraniol, further concentration decreases were observed at 30 g/hL of carbon.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Concentration of volatile compounds (μg/L) of red wines treated with different concentrations of carbon.

Discussion

Effects of enological practices on OTA.

Ochratoxin A values found in wines were consistent with data reported by Zimmerli and Dick (1996) and Soleas et al. (2001). The concentrations of OTA detected in the present study, however, were below the average values reported by Visconti et al. (1999) on 55 wines from southern Italy (Puglia region). This decrease may be due to the fact that in the last few years, the wide application of HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point) imposed processing practices, as well as the obligation to keep buildings and grounds in an orderly, hygenic, neat, and tidy condition, and the use of containers, equipment, and tanks clean and made of a suitable material, which guarantee hygenic conditions in Italian wineries (Italian Legislative Decree 155/97).

The higher OTA concentration detected in red wines with respect to white wines has been previously reported by several authors (Zimmerli and Dick 1996, Visconti et al. 1999). This phenomenon is likely linked to maceration, which may promote the release of OTA from grape skins. The role of grape skins as a carrier of OTA in wine was confirmed by the observation that intensive pressing of pomace increases OTA concentration in wine (Table 1⇑). Drying of grapes also increased the OTA concentration in the corresponding wines, resulting from the presence of OTA-producing fungi during the drying process. The data agree with those reported in the literature on Noble late-harvest South African wines (Stander and Steyn 2002) and Malaga wines from Spain (Zimmerli and Dick 1996). However, the concentration of berry constituents occurring during drying may have contributed to the increased OTA concentration observed in the final product.

Among the enological practices able to reduce OTA contamination in wine, microfiltration through a 0.45-μm membrane decreased contamination by about 80%. This reduction was likely a result of retaining the toxin by the filtration bed formed on a 0.45-μm membrane by wine macromolecules during treatment. Because 0.45-μm filtration is largely used in the production of white wines, this process may improve toxicological safety for winemaking.

Adorptive capacity of fining agents.

Consistent with Castellari et al. (2001), we observed that treatment with decolorizing carbon significantly decreased OTA concentration. Regression analysis indicates a decrease in OTA concentration with increased carbon dosage. In order to understand OTA adsorption to decolorizing carbon, the Freundlich adsorption isotherm was determined (Treybal 1955). The Freundlich model (x/m = KFC1/n) well fitted the experimental data (r2 = 0.9886,) and the specific absorption capacity value, KF, was 3.172 (mg/g)/(mg/L)0.8474 (Figure 2⇓). The value of KF was less than values reported by Castellari et al. (2001) when two different kinds of carbons were used to adsorb OTA from the wine; differences may be easily explained by the fact that the value of KF varies greatly with the nature of carbon used (Chen et al. 1997). This isotherm describes adsorption where the adsorbate has a heterogeneous surface with adsorption sites that have different energies of adsorption. Sites having the same adsorption energy are grouped together into one patch (Duong 1998). Thus the observed OTA behavior at increasing carbon concentration was due to the presence of specific binding sites and their gradual saturation. The decrease in OTA sorption capacity of carbon may be also due to direct competition for adsorption sites between OTA and other wine components. Competitive adsorption may be one of the more important factors influencing the binding efficiency of activated carbon toward target organic contaminant (Newcombe et al. 2002).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2

Freundlich isotherm for the adsorption of OTA from wine by carbon. Dependent variable x/m is the amount of OTA that is adsorbed per mass of carbon (mg/g), and C is the concentration of the OTA in the solution that is in equilibrium with the carbon (mg/L).

In our study, no significant reduction in the concentration of polyphenols in the experimental wines was observed, indicating no interference of these compounds on OTA adsorption (Table 2⇑). However, a decrease in some important aroma compounds of wine was observed (Table 3⇑). Among these, the decrease of alcohols such as 3-methyl-1-butanol is interesting, because the concentration of this compound is negatively correlated to the aroma quality of wine (Etiévant 1991). However, the 3-methyl-1-butanol concentrations detected after treatment were higher than the threshold value (30,000 μg/L) (Ferreira et al. 2000). Treatment with carbon (30 and 50 g/hL) for wine decontamination resulted in losses of other volatiles, such as ethyl fatty acids and acetates, volatile fatty acids, and geraniol. Among the esters with concentrations decreased by carbon treatment, 3-methylbutyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, and ethyl octanoate are of primary importance for the aroma of white wines. These compounds are characterized by fruity aromas that are frequently used to describe wine flavor and are correlated with enhanced aroma quality (van der Merve and van Wyk 1981). The concentrations detected after treatment were higher than the odor threshold values of each compound: 30 μg/L for 3-methylbutyl acetate, 14 μg/L for ethyl hexanoate, and 5.0 μg/L for ethyl octanoate (Ferreira et al. 2000). Octanoic and decanoic acids (threshold values 500 and 1000 μg/L, respectively) were also decreased by carbon treatment, although the sensory contribution of these compounds is generally considered less significant than that of esters (Ferreira et al. 2000, Etiévant 1991). Finally, the concentration of geraniol was significantly reduced by all treatments with carbon, although its decrease was not linked to the amount of carbon used. This terpene alcohol with an odor threshold value of 30 μg/L (Guth 1997) and linalool are the main volatiles responsible for the characteristic aroma of Muscat wines and the flowery aroma of Muscat-type wines. The results from the current study as well as those of Peòa et al. (2001) suggest that these wine volatiles compete with the carbon adsorption sites more readily than polyphenols. Although the use of carbon to remove OTA from wine is effective, it may also decrease overall wine aroma quality, which may limit the usefulness of this treatment during the production of high-quality wines.

Conclusion

Results indicate that several enological practices can affect OTA concentration in wines. In particular, intensive pressing of pomace and prolonged drying of grapes increased OTA concentration. Wines produced from contaminated sources contained the highest concentrations of OTA. These results emphasize the importance of sanitation procedures during production. Microfiltration at 0.45 μm and the use of carbon are two useful treatments for wine decontamination. Use of carbon results in the adsorption of several volatile compounds. Further studies are necessary to establish the correlation between OTA removal, the chemical nature of these important wine components, and the types of carbon used.

Footnotes

  • Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge F. Rusalem (S.P.A. Perdomini, Verona, Italy) for his collaboration and C.S. Turner for help in preparation of the manuscript.

  • Received December 2003.
  • Revision received July 2004.
  • Revision received January 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Literature Cited

  1. ↵
    Castellari, M., A. Versari, A. Fabiani, G.P. Parpinello, and S. Galassi. 2001. Removal of ochratoxin A in red wines by means of adsorption treatments with commercial fining agents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:3917–3921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Chen, G., B.W. Dussert, and I.H. Suffet. 1997. Evaluation of granular activated carbons for removal of methylisoborneol to below odor threshold concentration in drinking water. Water Res. 31:1155–1163.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Ciegler, A. 1972. Bioproduction of ochratoxin A and penicillic acid by members of the Aspergillus ochraceus group. Can. J. Microbiol. 18:631–636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Dumeau, F., and D. Trione. 2000. Trattamenti e ocratossina A nei vini. Vignevini 9:79–81.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    Duong, D.D. 1998. Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria and Kinetics. Imperial College Press, University of Queensland, Australia.
  6. ↵
    Etiévant, P. 1991. Wine. In Volatile Compounds in Foods and Beverages. H. Maarse (Ed.), pp. 483–546. Marcel Dekker, New York.
  7. ↵
    FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations). 1999. Conference on Mycotoxins. Mycotoxins of Growing Interest. Tunis, Tunisia.
  8. ↵
    Ferreira, V., R. Lopez, and J. Cacho. 2000. Quantitative determination of the odorants of young red wines from different grape varieties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80:1659–1667.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    Glories, Y. 1984. La couleur des vins rouges. Conn. Vigne Vin 18:253–271.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Guth, H. 1997. Quantitation and sensory studies of character impact odorants of different white wine varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:3027–3032.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    Heenam, C.N., C.N. Shaw, and J.I. Pitt. 1998. Ochratoxin A production by Aspergillus carbonarius and A. niger and detection using coconut cream agar. J. Food Mycol. 2:67–72.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1993. Monographs on evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: Some naturally occurring substances, food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins, pp. 489–521. Lyon, France.
  13. ↵
    Lubbers, S., A. Voilley, C. Charpentier, and M. Feuillat. 1993. Mise en évidence d’interactions entre les macromolécules et les arômes du vin. Influence des traitements de clarification sur la qualité aromatique du vin. Rev. Fr. Œnol. 33(144):12–18.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Margheri, L., and E. Falcesi. 1972. Importanza dell’evoluzione delle sostanze fenoliche nei vini rossi di qualità durante l’invecchiamento. Nota 2. Vini d’Italia 14:501–511.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Merve, van der, C.A., and C.J. van Wyk. 1981. The contribution of some fermentation products to the odor of dry white wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 32:41–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Merwe, van der, K.J., P.S. Steyne, and L. Fourie. 1965. Ochratoxin A, a toxic metabolite produced by Aspergillus ochraceus Wilh. Nature 205:1112–1113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Moio, L., M. Ugliano, A. Genovese, A. Gambuti, R. Pessina, and P. Piombino. 2004. Effect of antioxidant protection of must on volatile compounds and aroma shelf life of Falanghina (Vitis vinifera L.) wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:891–897.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Munro, I.C., C.A. Moodie, T. Kuiper-Goodman, P.M. Scott, and H.C. Grice. 1974. Toxicologic changes in rats fed graded dietary levels of ochratoxin A. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 28:180–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Newcombe, G., J. Morrison, C. Hepplewhite, and D.R.U. Knappe. 2002. Simultaneous adsorption of MIB and NOM onto activated carbon II. Competitive effects. Carbon 40:2147–2156.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    Peòa, J.M., N.S. Allen, M. Edge, C.M. Liauw, and B. Valange. 2001. Factors affecting the adsorption of fatty acids, alcohols and aromatic compounds on to carbon black pigments (flow micro-calorimetry studies). Dyes Pigments 49:29–49.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    Pitt, J.I. 1987. Penicillum viridicatum, Penicillum verrucosum, and production of ochratoxin A. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:226–269.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    Pohland, A.E., S. Nesheim, and L. Friedman. 1992. Ochratoxin A: A review. Pure Appl. Chem. 64:1029–1046.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    Ribereau-Gayon, P., and E. Stonestreet. 1965. Le dosage des anthocyanes dans les vins rouges. Bull. Soc. Chim. 9:2649–2652.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Scott, P.M., and S.R. Kanhere. 1995. Determination of ochratoxin A in beer. Food Addit. Contam. 12:591–598.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Singleton, V.L., and J.A. Rossi. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagent. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 16:144–158.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Soleas, G.J., J. Yan, and D.M. Goldberg. 2001. Assay of ochratoxin A in wine and beer by high-pressure liquid chromatography photodiode array and gas chromatography mass selective detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:2733–2740.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Stander, A., and P.S. Steyn. 2002. Survey of ochratoxin A in South African wines. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 23:9–13.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Treybal, R.E. 1955. Mass Transfer Operations. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  29. ↵
    Ueno, Y., S. Maki, J. Lin, M. Furuya, Y. Sugiura, and O. Kawamura. 1998. A four-year study of plasma ochratoxin A in a selected population in Tokyo by immunoassay and immunoaffinity column-linked HPLC. Food Chem. Toxicol. 36:445–449.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Visconti, A., M. Pascale, and G. Centonze. 1999. Determination of ochratoxin by means of immunoaffinity column clean up and high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr., A 1:89–101.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Vrabcheva, T., E. Usleber, R. Dietrich, and E. Martlbauer. 2000. Co-occurrence of ochratoxin A and citrinin in cereals from Bulgarian villages with a history of Balkan endemic nephropathy. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2483–2488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    WHO (World Health Organization). 1996. Ochratoxin A: Toxicological Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. WHO Food Add. Ser. 35, 36. Geneva, Switzerland.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    Zimmerli, B., and R. Dick. 1995. Determination of ochratoxin A at the ppt level in human blood, serum, milk and some foodstuffs by high-performance liquid chromatography with enhanced fluorescence detection and immunoaffinity column clean up: Methodology and Swiss data. J. Chromatogr., B 666:85–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Zimmerli, B., and R. Dick. 1996. Ochratoxin A in table wine and grape-juice: Occurrence and risk assessment. Food Addit. Cont. 6:655–668.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 56 Issue 2

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of Enological Practices on Ochratoxin A Concentration in Wine
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Influence of Enological Practices on Ochratoxin A Concentration in Wine
Angelita Gambuti, Daniela Strollo, Alessandro Genovese, Maurizio Ugliano, Alberto Ritieni, Luigi Moio
Am J Enol Vitic.  2005  56: 155-162  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2005.56.2.155
Angelita Gambuti
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Strollo
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Genovese
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Ugliano
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Ritieni
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luigi Moio
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: l.moio{at}unifg.it

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Influence of Enological Practices on Ochratoxin A Concentration in Wine
Angelita Gambuti, Daniela Strollo, Alessandro Genovese, Maurizio Ugliano, Alberto Ritieni, Luigi Moio
Am J Enol Vitic.  2005  56: 155-162  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2005.56.2.155
Angelita Gambuti
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Strollo
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessandro Genovese
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Ugliano
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Ritieni
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luigi Moio
1Dipartimento di Scienze degli Alimenti, Università di Foggia, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, Foggia 71100, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienza degli Alimenti, Università di Napoli, Via Università, 100, Portici (NA) 80055, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: l.moio{at}unifg.it
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • N, P, and K Supply to Pinot noir Grapevines: Impact on Vine Nutrient Status, Growth, Physiology, and Yield
  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
  • Leaf Blade versus Petiole Analysis for Nutritional Diagnosis of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2026 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire