Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
    • Print on Demand
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
    • Print on Demand
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Phenolic Reactions during Winemaking and Aging

Hélène Fulcrand, Montserrat Dueñas, Erika Salas, Véronique Cheynier
Am J Enol Vitic.  2006 57: 289-297 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.3.289
Hélène Fulcrand
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fulcrand@ensam.inra.fr
Montserrat Dueñas
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika Salas
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Véronique Cheynier
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The reactivity of polyphenols is due to the position of the hydroxyl groups on their aromatic nuclei. Ortho-hydroxyl groups promote oxidation while meta-hydroxyl groups induce electrophilic aromatic substitution. Both hydroxylation patterns are encountered in flavonoid structures, on the B and A rings, respectively. In addition to oxidation and electrophilic aromatic substitution, flavonoids undergo nucleophilic addition on the central C ring when it is positively charged. Reactions of the A and C rings are pH-dependent. The A ring of flavonoids undergoes a polycondensation reaction mediated by an aldehyde. The products are anthocyanin and flavanol polymers and copolymers constituted of both. Flavanol polymers are not stable and rearrange into vinyl flavanols and xanthylium pigments. Vinyl flavanols can react with the positively charged C ring of anthocyanins, yielding pyranoanthocyanins, which can also be formed from components that have a reactive double bond, such as carbonyl and ethylene bonds. The positively charged C ring primarily undergoes direct reactions. Since the positive charge on the C ring of anthocyanins and flavanols is pH-dependent, their dehydration and interflavan bond cleavage reactions are also pH-dependent. This leads to flavanol–anthocyanin (F-A+) adducts at lower pH values and anthocyanin–flavanol (A+-F) adducts above pH 3.8. Temperature seems to favor formation of the latter.

  • tannins
  • anthocyanins
  • polyphenols
  • wine
  • reactions

Polyphenol and Flavonoid Reactions

Polyphenolic structures are based on aromatic nuclei and most have more than one hydroxyl group. The presence of hydroxyl groups in the aromatic system alters its reactivity. The high electron density of the aromatic ring, enhanced by the mesomeric effect of the electron-donating hydroxyl groups, increases the electron density at particular sites of the aromatic ring (Figure 1a⇓); at the ortho-position on the carbons adjacent to the one bearing the hydroxyl group and at the para-position on the carbon opposite the carbon bearing the hydroxyl group. These activated carbons with partial negative charges are nucleophilic sites and promote electrophilic aromatic substitutions (Figure 1b⇓): the hydrogen atom attached to the partly negative carbon is replaced by an electron-deficient species (electrophile). The strength of activation depends on the number and relative positions of the hydroxyl groups. The strongest effect is achieved with three hydroxyl groups equally distributed on the phenyl ring, a resorcinol-type structure found in the A ring of the flavonoid skeleton (Figure 1c⇓).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1

Activated sites of phenols (a); electrophilic aromatic substitution (b); flavonoid ring (c).

The partial migration of electron density from the oxygen atom of the hydroxyl groups to the aromatic ring increases the acidity of the hydroxyl groups, facilitating the loss of a proton (H+) (Figure 2a⇓). The resulting phenolate anion oxidizes readily. When two hydroxyl groups are on adjacent carbons of the aromatic ring, the phenolic system can readily oxidize to an ortho-quinone. This hydroxylation pattern is found in catechol and the B ring of the flavanol series of flavonoids (Figure 2b⇓).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2

Oxidation of ortho-diphenols (a); B ring of flavonoid (b).

Flavonoids are the most important family among grape polyphenols, both in quantity and quality. Their structures are comprised of the two polyhydroxylated aromatic A and B rings connected through a central pyran ring, referred to as the C ring (Figure 3a⇓). The C ring can be more or less saturated; the number of double bonds (unsaturation) determines the class of flavonoids (Figure 3b⇓). The fully unsaturated C ring corresponds to a pyrilium cation and is the structure of anthocyanins, the red pigments of grapes. A fully saturated C ring gives flavanols a class that includes both monomeric and polymeric structures. The latter are usually called condensed tannins or proanthocyanidins. Cleaving the interflavan linkage (IFL) between the flavanol units of the polymeric chain under even mildly acidic conditions gives rise to highly reactive carbocations. These can further oxidize to anthocyanidins (hence the name proanthocyanidin), or they can be trapped by electron-rich chemicals known as nucleophiles. Anthocyanins are also positively charged in their flavylium forms (pyrilium structures). This positive charge on the C ring, found in anthocyanins or readily generated in proanthocyanidins, makes the C ring react as an electron-deficient species, or electrophile. In anthocyanins, this positive charge can be lost by hydration, and in proanthocyanidins it can be gained by acid-catalyzed cleavage; both processes are pH-dependent. Thus, anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins can react either as nucleophiles or electrophiles depending on pH (Figure 3c⇓). Our goal is to review various reactions of anthocyanins and flavanols.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 3

Flavonoid skeleton and variation of flavonoid structure in C ring (a). Reactions leading to electrophilic and nucleophilic species among anthocyanins and flavanols (b).

Anthocyanin Reactions

Anthocyanins are usually represented as their red-colored forms, the flavylium cations. Because of the positive charge, flavylium cations are not very stable, and there are two ways they can yield neutral species, acid-base equilibrium and hydration.

Acid-base equilibrium.

The first mechanism is a proton transfer corresponding to an acid-base equilibrium. In this equilibrium, the cation (AH+) is the acidic molecule and the neutral quinoidal base (A) is the basic species:

Embedded Image

This equilibrium is instantaneous (Brouillard et al. 1977a, b). The position of the equilibrium is described by the acidity constant (pKa = − log Ka) characteristic of the particular anthocyanin molecule. Thus, the relative proportions of cation (AH+) and base (A−) depend on pH. The pKa value of malvidin 3-glucoside, a major grape anthocyanin, is 4.2 (Brouillard et al. 1978).

Hydration.

The second mechanism by which flavylium cations are converted into neutrally charged species is hydration. This reaction is a nucleophilic addition of water to the pyrilium nucleus, most often at C2 and less often at C4. The products of hydration are colorless hemiketals (AOH) that are in turn partly converted into tautomeric chalcones:

Embedded Image

The equilibrium position is described by a hydration constant (pKh = − log Kh) characteristic of the anthocyanin molecule. The hydration reaction is much slower than acid-base conversion and requires several hours to reach equilibrium. The proportion of flavylium and hemiketal forms is determined by the hydration constant to pH ratio. For malvidin 3-glucoside, estimated pKh is 2.6 (Brouillard et al. 1977a,b). At pH >2.6, malvidin-3-glucoside is mainly in the colorless hemiketal form. At wine pH (3.6), 90% of the anthocyanins are hydrated flavylium cations. In this form, anthocyanins react as nucleophiles through their A ring, like flavanols. Therefore, some color-stabilizing reactions may proceed in wine. A well-known process occurring in the plant is driven by the aromatic properties of the colored forms of anthocyanins. The planar shape and hydrophobicity conferred by the aromatic rings favor vertical stacking of the colored forms of anthocyanins between them (self-association), or with other planar structures (copigmentation), or with an aromatic residue connected to the pigment (intramolecular copigmentation) (Brouillard et al. 1989, Goto et al. 1991, Dangles et al. 1992a,b). The color properties of anthocyanins are covered elsewhere (Cheynier et al. 2006).

A second way that anthocyanins preserve their color is the conversion of anthocyanins into more stable chromophores through chemical reactions, which occurs when the cellular integrity of the grape berries is broken and the different grape constituents are mixed together. Before reviewing these reactions, it is important to examine bisulfite addition, another major reaction responsible for anthocyanin discoloration in wines.

Bilsulfite addition.

Bisulfite is used in food processing and winemaking to protect against microbial and fungal growth and to inhibit chemical oxidation. However, it makes a colorless adduct with the red forms of anthocyanins (Jurd 1963):

Embedded Image

The sulfite dissociation constant (pKs) is 5, so the anthocyanin-sulfite adduct is stable at wine pH (3.2 to 4). Therefore, anthocyanins are trapped as noncolored bisulfite adducts in proportion to the amount of sulfite added in musts. The structure of the adducts was recently confirmed by Berke et al. (1998).

Formation of pyranoanthocyanins.

Some wine constituents and yeast metabolites react with the electrophilic portion of the flavylium cation to form new, stable pigments. An additional pyran ring forms between the hydroxyl attached to C5 and the C4 of the original anthocyanin, giving rise to a pyranoanthocyanin (Figure 4⇓). The nucleophile for this reaction must have a polarizable double bond, activated by an electron-donating group. For example, the grape p-hydroxy-substituted cinnamic acids react with the grape anthocyanins (Schwarz et al. 2003a, Schwarz and Winterhalter 2003), yielding the hydroxy-phenyl pyranoanthocyanin series (also called vinylphenol or vinylcatechol adducts; the latter also called pinotin A), which was initially obtained from the corresponding vinyl derivatives (Fulcrand et al. 1996, Sarni-Manchado et al. 1996). Another class of reactants have an enolizable double bond. Acetaldehyde, pyruvate, and other yeast metabolites formed pyranoanthocyanin-type pigments (Fulcrand et al. 1998, Benabdeljalil et al. 2000, Mateus et al. 2001), more commonly referred to as vitisin A and vitisin B (Bakker et al. 1997, Revilla et al. 1999, Romero et al. 2000a, Schwarz et al. 2003b). The particular pyranoanthocyanins formed depend on grape cultivar (Pozo-Bayon et al. 2004, Schwarz et al. 2004) and winemaking conditions such as yeast strain (Romero et al. 2000b, Morata et al. 2003). More complex structures, such as flavanol-yl pyranoanthocyanins have been detected in wines (Francia-Aricha et al. 1997, Mateus et al. 2002a,b). Their formation requires a flavanol, an anthocyanin, and acetaldehyde. Two reaction pathways have been proposed (Atanasova 2003). Flavanyl pyranoanthocyanins could result from the reaction of flavanol with a pyranoanthocyanin previously formed from acetaldehyde and anthocyanin. Alternatively, a vinyl-flavanol might react with anthocyanin. Vinyl-flavanols result from cleaving of the dimer formed by acetaldehyde-mediated condensation of an anthocyanin and a flavanol. A blue pyranoanthocyanin-like pigment with a larger chromophore has recently been identified (Mateus et al. 2003). The high stability of pyranoanthocyanins over a wide pH range has sparked growing interest in the enological study of wine color.

Figure 4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 4

Pyranoanthocyanin formation. Yeast metabolites: acetaldehyde (R1: H), pyruvate (R1: COOH). Wine constituents: vinyl phenol (R2: H), caffeic acid (R2: COOH), flavanol (R2: H).

Polymerization reactions of anthocyanins.

Direct reaction and acetaldehyde-mediated condensation have recently been proposed as possible mechanisms of anthocyanin polymerization, yielding polyethyl-anthocyanins (A+-Et-AOH) and A-type anthocyanin polymers A-(O)-A+ (Atanasova et al. 2002a, Vidal et al. 2004). No formal NMR structural identification has yet been published for the direct anthocyanin product. However, evidence of such a reaction is available from liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analyses of a wine fraction before and after thiolysis (Salas et al. 2005). Anthocyanin polymerization is highly relevant to wine composition. How polymers form and which factors promote their formation need clarification, as do their color, colloidal properties, and contribution to wine sensory attributes.

Flavanol Reactions

Oxidation.

Oxidation of polyphenols can proceed either by transfer of one electron via the formation of a phenoxyl radical (semiquinone) intermediate or by transfer of two electrons via the formation of a quinone intermediate. Semiquinones of polyphenols are unstable and decay via dimerization or disproportionation. Disproportionation is especially common if the semiquinone contains a catechol nucleus and leads to the formation of the corresponding ortho-quinone and the regeneration of the parent catechol (Dangles et al. 2000). The ortho-quinone itself is also unstable because of its high electrophilic character and can react further in three ways. First, ortho-quinones can form dimers or larger polymers when they react with the nucleophilic parent catechol molecule. Structural identification of several oxidation dimers of catechin (Guyot et al. 1995, 1996) showed the presence of specific linkages in their structures located between the B ring of the upper unit and A ring of the lower unit of the biphenyl ether (Cφ-O-Cφ) or biphenyl (Cφ-Cφ) linkages. The biphenyl ether linkage requires a radical mechanism. Both dimer types were formed during oxidation at pH 3, indicating that semiquinone and quinone formations were in competition. At pH 6, only biphenyl linkages were identified, suggesting that the radical mechanism was no longer competitive. Second, ortho-quinones can undergo nucleophilic addition with other good nucleophiles such as amino acid residues of peptides or proteins, the cystein of gluthatione, or other phenols. Third, ortho-quinones can be oxidized by reducing species such as ascorbate or other phenols.

Flavanol oxidation in wine uses molecular di-oxygen (O2) and is thus referred to as autoxidation. The direct reaction between polyphenols and O2 is not chemically favored except under very basic conditions not found in wine. In acidic solutions, metal ions such as Fe(III) are efficient catalysts of oxidation (Hynes et al. 2001, Mochizuki et al. 2002). The resulting chain reaction of autoxidation is summarized by the following equation:

Embedded Image

The decay of hydrogen peroxide (HO•) by traces of metal ions (a Fenton reaction) produces the very reactive hydroxyl radical (HO°) as follows:

Embedded Image

The regeneration of Fe(III) in the Fenton reaction allows the cycle to continue.

Alternatively, hydrogen peroxide can oxidize ethanol to acetaldehyde (Wildenradt et al. 1974) in the presence of Fe(II) (Inui et al. 2004):

Embedded Image

Although acetaldehyde is a yeast metabolite, it can be regarded as an oxidation marker (Atanasova et al. 2002b). Similarly, tartaric acid is oxidized in the presence of iron and molecular oxygen to give glyoxylic acid, which also contains an aldehyde moiety. Consequently, oxidation generates two species that react with polyphenols: direct oxidation products, such as semiquinones and quinones, and aldehydes, such as acetaldehyde.

Aldehyde polycondensation.

Aldehydes undergo polycondensation reactions with flavonoids. Acetaldehyde, glyoxylic acid, furfural, and hydroxymethyl furfural, which are sugar dehydration products formed during oak toasting and extracted during barrel aging, react with both flavanols and hydrated forms of anthocyanins (Es-Safi et al. 2004). The mechanism of this reaction is a Friedel–Crafts-type reaction (Figure 5a⇓). Acidic conditions allow traces of the protonated aldehyde, which is a powerful electrophile. The resorcinol-type A ring of the flavonoid structure undergoes an electrophilic aromatic substitution, where the C8/C6 hydrogen is replaced by the addition product of the protonated aldehyde, namely the corresponding alcohol. This intermediate dehydrates to give a new carbocation, which in turns reacts with a second nucleophilic flavonoid. The reaction starts again from the newly formed dimers, leading ultimately to polymers (Figure 5b⇓). When anthocyanins are involved in the reaction, polymeric purple pigments are generated. The polymers produced by flavanol aldehyde polycondensation are unstable and undergo other reactions. With acetaldehyde, the ethyl linkages generated in the polycondensated flavanol polymer are very labile and cleave into vinyl-flavanol oligomers (Figure 5c⇓). These vinyl-flavanol oligomers can then react with anthocyanins to produce the flavanyl pyranoanthocyanins.

Figure 5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 5

Mechanism of aldehyde-mediated polycondensation (a). Products arising from polycondensation reactions (b): R-methine anthocyanin polymer (I); R-methine anthocyanin-flavanol copolymer (II); R-methine flavanol polymer (III). Rearrangement of R-methine flavanol polymer (c) (II) into xanthylium ions (III) and (a) vinyl-flavanols (I).

Another rearrangement can occur with polycondensated flavanol polymers, first demonstrated with glyoxylic acid (Es-Safi et al. 1999a). A condensation between two A rings of the polymer leads to a xanthylium structure (Figure 5c⇑). Xanthylium pigments have not been detected when acetaldehyde is reacted with flavanols, but the orange coloration of the initial solution is characteristic of the xanthylium chromophore. Furthermore, purple pigments were obtained along with xanthylium cations from a reaction between catechin and glyoxylic acid (Es-Safi et al. 1999b). The structures postulated for such pigments were based on the quinonoidal skeleton.

The end products of flavanol oxidation by other flavanols or by aldehydes are much more stable than the parent flavanols. Biphenyl or biphenyl ether linkages in the direct oxidation products of flavanols are particularly resistant to acid-catalyzed cleavage. The aldehyde-mediated polycondensation polymers are not as stable but can rearrange into more stable pigments, namely pyranoanthocyanins and xanthylium. The extent of oxidation and subsequent polymerization depends on several factors, including oxygen availability and the anthocyanin to flavanol ratio. Other reactions may compete with oxidation, including direct reactions between anthocyanins and flavanols.

Interflavan linkage formation and cleavage.

Inter-flavan bond formation and cleavage determine the size distribution of tannins in wines (Haslam 1980). Consequently, the size distribution of the tannin fraction is partly dependent on the ratio of flavanol monomers to polymers. As demonstrated in model wine (Vidal et al. 2002), an excess of monomer decreased the mean degree of polymerization (mDP) of the tannin fraction, while that of the control solution was unchanged. This bond-breaking and bond-making process occurs at low pH (2.0 to 3.2) (Vidal et al. 2002), but cannot occur above pH 3.8 (Salas et al. 2003). Further experiments at intermediate pH values would clarify the impact of this process on the overall size distribution of wine tannins.

Reactions between anthocyanins and flavanols.

Anthocyanins in hydrated form are nucleophiles and thus compete with flavanol molecules in the bond-making process of tannin reorganization (Salas et al. 2003). Two mechanisms have been postulated for direct reactions between anthocyanins and flavanols, leading to flavanol-anthocyanin (F-A+) and anthocyanin-flavanol (A+-F) adducts, respectively. To form A+-F, anthocyanin in its flavylium form reacts as an electrophile with a nucleophilic flavanol through C8/C6, the partially negatively charged carbons of the A ring (Figure 6⇓). The first addition step leads to a colorless flavene intermediate (Figure 6a⇓), which can be oxidized into the red flavylium form (Figure 6b⇓) and then dehydrated to yield the xanthylium cation (Figure 6c⇓) (Jurd 1969, Somers 1971, Liao et al. 1992). Alternatively, the transitory flavene can evolve to a colorless cyclic adduct linked with an A-type bond [A-(4-8, 2-O-7)-T] (Remy-Tanneau et al. 2003).

Figure 6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 6

Formation of the (A+-F) dimer: flavene (a); flavylium cation (b); xanthylium cation (c); (A+-F) dimer (d).

To form F-A+, the nucleophile and electrophile are reversed. The hydrated hemiketal form (AOH) of anthocyanin reacts as a nucleophile with a flavanol carbocation generated by interflavan cleavage of a tannin molecule. This produces a colorless dimer (F-AOH), which may partially dehydrate to the corresponding red flavylium (F-A+), depending on the wine pH and its own pKh.

Both reactions are pH-dependent, since the production of A+ and F+ cations requires acidic conditions. Thus, the reaction between B2 3′-O-gallate (Ec-EcG) and the major grape anthocyanin malvidin 3-glucoside (Mv3glc) was investigated at pH 2.0 in order to ensure formation of both cations (A+ and F+) and determine which mechanism is favored. The reaction was also studied at pH 3.8 to evaluate what happens at wine pH. Reaction products were obtained at both pH values, but their structures were different (Figure 7⇓). Flavanol polymers (Figure 7a⇓) and flavanol-anthocyanin (F-A+) polymers (Figure 7b⇓) were produced in the most acidic solution, showing that dimer cleavage occurred and that the low concentration of AOH (20%) did not limit formation of F-A+. At pH 3.8, A+-F type oligomers (Figure 7c⇓) were identified but flavanol polymers could not be detected, suggesting that the interflavan linkage was not cleaved at this pH.

Figure 7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 7

Effect of pH on flavanol-anthocyanin reactions: flavanol polymers (a); F-A+ polymers (b); A+-F oligomers (c).

Similar experiments were conducted with a flavanol monomer instead of the flavanol dimer (Duenas et al. 2006). Under these conditions, the formation of F-A+ polymers is not possible and the A+-F dimer should be found instead. However, A+-F product could not be detected at pH 2.0 or 3.8. Instead, xanthylium chromophores were identified by their characteristic λmax (438 nm). Their masses were 633 and 453 dalton, indicating that the anthocyanin and/or flavanol units were not intact in the xanthylium pigments. Similar xanthylium chromophores were obtained from a synthetic flavylium (Escribano-Bailon et al. 1996). The authors also synthesized A+-F dimer from a homologous synthetic flavylium with no hydroxyl at the C5 position. Hence, the presence of a hydroxyl group at C5 decreased the fraction of the positive charge at C4, and thus decreased the electrophilic character of the flavylium ion.

Conversely, when flavanol oligomers (di-, tri-, and tetramers) reacted with an anthocyanin at pH 3 and high temperature, only A+-F pigments were identified (Malien-Aubert et al. 2002). The absence of F-A+ polymer under these conditions suggests that the conversion of the chalcone (which is in equilibrium with the hydrated form of anthocyanin) into thermo-degradation products is faster than the reaction between hydrated anthocyanins and flavanol carbocations. In addition, A+ -F dimers generated from flavanol monomers and dimers by cleavage of the interflavan bond underwent further dehydration to give xanthylium pigments (Figure 8⇓), whereas the A+-F pigment yielded by the flavanol trimer was stable. The next step of xanthylium ion formation, dehydration, was probably blocked by the flavylium chromophore.

Figure 8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 8

Effect of flavanol chain length (n) on the type of pigment arising from the A+-F reaction.

Studies emphasize the effects of pH and temperature on flavanol-anthocyanin reactions and the role of flavanol size (degree of polymerization) in determining xanthylium or flavylium products. Interflavan bond cleavage is related to the size of tannin molecule, but it depends more strongly on the structure of the tannin molecule and the nature of its constitutive units. Consequently, both types of oligomers, A+-F and F-A+, form at wine pH. The hydration constant pKh of 2.5 for the cat-Mv3glc dimer indicates color properties similar to the parent anthocyanin (Salas et al. 2004). However, larger oligomers may have different color properties because of folding, which prevents hydration of the flavylium nucleus.

Research on flavanol reactions is limited by a lack of information on the molecular weight distribution of the grape flavanol fraction and its reaction products. Thus, quantification of the various flavanol products and their relative proportions has not yet been achieved. Better methods of determining polymeric structures must be developed in order for knowledge of wine polymers to advance.

Conclusion

Numerous reactions of flavonoids occur in the course of winemaking and aging, producing a huge variety of colorless products and pigments. Their relative quantity depends on many factors (Fulcrand et al. 2004). The pH determines the percentage of the flavylium cations compared with the hydrated forms of anthocyanins. It also controls some other reaction pathways: semiquinone and quinone formation, subsequent steps in their oxidation, acetaldehyde-induced polymerization, and interflavan and ethyl bond cleavages. Temperature and flavanol structure also affect the products of direct reactions. At pH <3.8, F-A+ products were produced, but the reverse structures, A+-F pigments, were identified at high temperature (50°C). In addition, the direct reaction carried out with flavanol monomers led to xanthylium pigments instead of A+-F pigments, which were obtained with larger flavanols (dimers and trimers).

The relative proportions of anthocyanins and flavanols also affect the nature and size of wine pigments and tannins. An excess of anthocyanins significantly increases anthocyanin polymers, which are more stable than their precursors. High tannin concentration may favor direct reactions between anthocyanins and flavanols, competing with the continuous bond-breaking and bond-making of tannins themselves. Both processes change the mean degree of polymerization of the flavanol fraction. Oxygen favors autoxidation reactions. Direct reactions between di-oxygen and organic molecules such as polyphenols is not chemically possible, but they are catalyzed efficiently by traces of metal ions, especially iron. Two common oxidation reactions are oxidative flavanol polymerization and aldehyehyde-mediated polycondensations of anthocyanins and flavanols.

The pH, anthocyanin to tannin ratio, and oxygen availability vary with grapegrowing and winemaking conditions. The relative proportions of anthocyanins and flavanols in grapes depend primarily on the variety, but can be modified by environmental and cultural conditions. Winemaking practices also help determine the extraction of phenolic compounds and their subsequent reactions in wine. Maceration conditions greatly affect the relative proportion of anthocyanins and flavanols diffusing into the wine. Wine pH depends on grape maturity and fermentation, but it can be altered by addition of tartaric acid or electrodialysis. Oxygen levels in wine depend mostly on handling during winemaking. Any operation involving air contact may introduce dissolved oxygen: wine transfer, stirring, racking, stabilization, or bottling. Apart from these accidental inputs, oxygen can be introduced in a controlled manner using microoxygenation to improve the sensory character of the wine.

The use of new winemaking technologies is governed by the experience and empiricism of winemakers. Despite recent progress in wine phenolic chemistry, the exact relationship between red wine quality and grape and wine composition is still unclear. Information is needed on how structural changes such as linkage type and incorporation of anthocyanin in the tannin core affect tannin properties. Tannin properties essential for wine quality include not only aggregation and colloidal stability but also interactions with other wine macromolecules involved in astrigency such as proteins and polysaccharides. In our goal to control the quality of wine through selection of appropriate winemaking processes, a key challenge is how molecular changes in the tannin fraction affect the sensory quality of wines.

Footnotes

  • This article was originally presented at the ASEV 56th Annual Meeting Phenolics Symposium, 20–21 June 2005, Seattle, WA. All phenolics symposium articles were peer reviewed by two fellow presenters, and James Harbertson, Mark Downey, and Sara Spayd served as technical editors of the articles.

  • From the ASEV 2005 Phenolics Symposium

  • Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Literature Cited

  1. ↵
    Atanasova, V. 2003. Réactions des composés phénoliques induites dans les vins rouges par la technique de micro-oxygénation. Caractérisation de nouveaux produits de condensation des anthocyanes avec l’acétaldéhyde. Thesis. Sci. Aliments. Montpellier, ENSAM:249.
  2. ↵
    Atanasova, V., H. Fulcrand, C. Le Guerneve, V. Cheynier, and M. Moutounet. 2002a. Structure of a new dimeric acetaldehyde malvidin 3-glucoside condensation product. Tetrahedron Lett. 43:6151–6153.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Atanasova, V., H. Fulcrand, V. Cheynier, and M. Moutounet. 2002b. Effect of oxygenation on polyphenol changes occurring in the course of wine making. Anal. Chim. Acta 458:15–27.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Bakker, J., P. Bridle, T. Honda, H. Kuwano, N. Saito, N. Terahara, and C.F. Timberlake. 1997. Identification of an anthocyanin occurring in some red wines. Phytochemistry 44:1375–1382.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    Benabdeljalil, C., V. Cheynier, H. Fulcrand, A. Hakiki, M. Mosaddak, and M. Moutounet. 2000. Mise en évidence de nouveaux pigments formés par réaction des anthocyanes avec des métabolites de levures. Sci. Aliments 20:203–220.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Berke, B., C. Chèze, J. Vercauteren, and G. Deffieux. 1998. Bisulfite addition to anthocyanins: Revisited structures of colourless adducts. Tetrahedron Lett. 39:5771–5774.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Brouillard, R., and B. Delaporte. 1977a. Chemistry of anthocyanin pigments. 2. Kinetic and thermodynamic study of proton transfer, hydration, and tautomeric reactions of malvidin 3-glucoside. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99:8461–8468.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Brouillard, R., and J.E. Dubois. 1977b. Mechanism of the structural transformations of anthocyanins in acidic media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99:1359–1364.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Brouillard, R., B. Delaporte, and J.E. Dubois. 1978. Chemistry of anthocyanin pigments. 3. Relaxation amplitudes in pH-jump experiments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100:19.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Brouillard, R., G. Mazza, Z. Saad, A.M. Albrecht-Gary, and A. Cheminat. 1989. The copigmentation reaction of anthocyanins: A microprobe for the structural study of aqueous solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111:2604–2610.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Dangles, O., and R. Brouillard. 1992a. Polyphenol interactions. The copigmentation case: Thermodynamic data from temperature variation and relaxation kinetics. Medium effect. Can. J. Chem. 70:2174–2189.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. Dangles, O., and R. Brouillard. 1992b. A spectroscopic method based on the anthocyanin copigmentation interaction and applied to the quantitative study of molecular complexes. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2:247–257.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Dangles, O., G. Fargeix, and C. Dufour. 2000. Antioxidant properties of anthocyanins and tannins: A mechanistic investigation with catechin and the 3′,4′,7-trihydroxyflavylium ion. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 8:1653–1663.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Duenas, M., H. Fulcrand, and V. Cheynier. 2006. Formation of anthocyanin-flavanol adducts in model solutions. Paper presented at the 4th Symposium in Vino Analytica Scientia. July 2005. Montpellier. Anal. Chim. Acta 563:15–25.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Escribano-Bailon, M., O. Dangles, and R. Brouillard. 1996. Coupling reactions between flavylium ions and catechin. Phytochemistry 41:1583–1592.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    Es-Safi, N., and V. Cheynier. 2004. Flavanols and anthocyanins as potent compounds in the formation of new pigments during storage and ageing of red wine. In Red Wine Color: Revealing the Mysteries. A.L. Waterhouse and J.A. Kennedy (Eds.), pp. 143–159. Am. Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
  17. ↵
    Es-Safi, N.E., C. Le Guerneve, B. Labarbe, H. Fulcrand, V. Cheynier, and M. Moutounet. 1999a. Structure of a new xanthylium salt derivative. Tetrahedron Lett. 40:5869–5872.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Es-Safi, N.E., C. Le Guerneve, H. Fulcrand, V. Cheynier, and M. Moutounet. 1999b. New polyphenolic compounds with xanthylium skeletons formed through reaction between (+)-catechin and glyoxylic acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47:5211–5217.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Francia-Aricha, E.M., M.T. Guerra, J.C. Rivas-Gonzalo, and C. Santos-Buelga. 1997. New anthocyanin pigments formed after condensation with flavanols. J. Agric. Food Chem. 45:2262–2266.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    Fulcrand, H., P.J. Cameira dos Santos, P. Sarni-Manchado, V. Cheynier, and J. Favre-Bonvin. 1996. Structure of new anthocyanin-derived wine pigments. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 7:735–739.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    Fulcrand, H., C. Benabdeljalil, J. Rigaud, V. Cheynier, and M. Moutounet. 1998. A new class of wine pigments yielded by reactions between pyruvic acid and grape anthocyanins. Phytochemistry 47:1401–1407.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Fulcrand, H., V. Atanasova, E. Salas, and V. Cheynier. 2004. The fate of anthocyanins in wine: Are there determining factors? In Red Wine Color: Revealing the Mysteries. A.L. Waterhouse and J.A. Kennedy (Eds.), pp. 68–85. Am. Chemical Society, Washington, DC.
  23. ↵
    Goto, T., and T. Kondo. 1991. Structure and molecular stacking of anthocyanins. Flower color variation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 30:17–33.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Guyot, S., V. Cheynier, J.M. Souquet, and M. Moutounet. 1995. Influence of pH on the enzymatic oxidation of (+)-catechin in model systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43:2458–2462.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    Guyot, S., J. Vercauteren, and V. Cheynier. 1996. Structural determination of colourless and yellow dimers resulting from (+)-catechin oxidative coupling catalysed by grape polyphenoloxidase. Phytochemistry 42:1279–1288.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    Haslam, E. 1980. In vino veritas: Oligomeric procyanidins and the ageing of red wines. Phytochemistry 19:2577–2582.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    Hynes, M.J., and M.O. Coinceanainn. 2001. The kinetics and mechanisms of the reaction of iron(III) with gallic acid, gallic acid methyl ester and catechin. J. Inorg. Biochem. 85:131–142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Inui, T., K. Nakahara, and M. Uchida. 2004. Oxidation of ethanol induced by simple polyphenols: Prooxidant property of polyphenols. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 77:1201–1207.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Jurd, L. 1963. Reactions involved in sulfite bleaching of anthocyanins. Food Chem. 33:225–237.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    Jurd, L. 1969. Review of polyphenol condensation reactions and their possible occurrence in the aging of wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 20:197–195.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Liao, H., Y. Cai, and E. Haslam. 1992. Polyphenol interactions. Anthocyanins: Co-pigmentation and colour changes in red wines. J. Sci. Food Agric. 59:299–305.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    Malien-Aubert, C., O. Dangles, and M.J. Amiot. 2002. Influence of procyanidins on the color stability of oenin solutions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:3299–3305.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    Mateus, N., A.M.S. Silva, J. Vercauteren, and V. de Freitas. 2001. Occurrence of anthocyanin-derived pigments in red wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:4836–4840.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    Mateus, N., A.M.S. Silva, C. Santos-Buelga, J.C. Rivas-Gonzalo, and V. de Freitas. 2002a. Identification of anthocyanin-flavanol pigments in red wines by NMR and mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:2110–2116.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Mateus, N., S. de Pascual-Teresa, J. Rivas-Gonzalo, C. Santos-Buelga, and V. de Freitas. 2002b. Structural diversity of anthocyanin-derived pigments in port wines. Food Chem. 76:335–342.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Mateus, N., A.M.S. Silva, J.C. Rivas-Gonzalo, C. Santos-Buelga, and V. de Freitas. 2003. A new class of blue anthocyanin-derived pigments isolated from red wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:1919–1923.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    Mochizuki, M., S.I. Yamazaki, K. Kano, and T. Ikeda. 2002. Kinetic analysis and mechanistic aspects of autoxidation of catechins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1569:35–44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    Morata, A., M.C. Gómez Cordovés, B. Colomo, and J.A. Suarez. 2003. Pyruvic acid and acetaldehyde production by different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Relationship with vitisin A and B formation in red wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:7402–7409.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    Pozo-Bayon, M., M. Monagas, M. Polo, and C. Gómez Cordovés. 2004. Occurrence of pyranoanthocyanins in sparkling wines manufactured with red wine varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52: 1300–1306.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Remy-Tanneau, S., C.L. Guerneve, E. Meudec, and V. Cheynier. 2003. Characterization of a colorless anthocyanin-flavan-3-ol dimer containing both carbon-carbon and ether interflavanoid linkages by NMR and mass spectrometries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:3592–3597.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Revilla, I., S. Perez-Magarino, M.L. Gonzalez-San Jose, and S. Beltran. 1999. Identification of anthocyanin derivatives in grape skin extracts and red wines by liquid chromatography with diode array and mass spectrometric detection. J. Chromatogr., A 847:83–90.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    Romero, C., and J. Bakker. 2000a. Effect of acetaldehyde and several acids on the formation of vitisin A in model wine anthocyanin and colour evolution. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 35:129–140.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    Romero, C., and J. Bakker. 2000b. Effect of storage temperature and pyruvate on kinetics of anthocyanin degradation, vitisin A formation and color characteristics of model solution. J. Agric. Food Chem. 48:2135–2141.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    Salas, E., M. Dueñas, M. Schwarz, P. Winterhalter, V. Cheynier, and H. Fulcrand. 2005. Characterization of pigments from different high speed countercurrent chromatography wine fractions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:4536–4546.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    Salas, E., H. Fulcrand, E. Meudec, and V. Cheynier. 2003. Reactions of anthocyanins and tannins in model solutions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:7951–7961.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    Salas, E., C. Le Guernevé, H. Fulcrand, C. Poncet-Legrand, and V. Cheynier. 2004. Structure determination and color properties of a newly synthesized direct-linked flavanol-anthocyanin dimer. Tetrahedron Lett. 45:8725–8729.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    Sarni-Manchado, P., H. Fulcrand, J.M. Souquet, V. Cheynier, and M. Moutounet. 1996. Stability and color of unreported wine anthocyanin-derived pigments. J. Food Sci. 61:938–941.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Schwarz, M., and P. Winterhalter. 2003. A novel synthetic route to substituted pyranoanthocyanins with unique colour properties. Tetrahedron Lett. 44:7583–7587.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Schwarz, M., T.C. Wabnitz, and P. Winterhalter. 2003a. Pathway leading to the formation of anthocyanin-vinylphenol adducts and related pigments in red wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:3682–3687.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Schwarz, M., P. Quast, D. von Baer, and P. Winterhalter. 2003b. Vitisin A content in Chilean wines from Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and contribution to the color of aged red wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:6261–6267.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. ↵
    Schwarz, M., G. Hofmann, and P. Winterhalter. 2004. Investigations on anthocyanins in wines from Vitis vinifera cv. Pinotage: Factors influencing the formation of pinotin A and its correlation with wine age. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:498–504.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    Somers, T.C. 1971. The polymeric nature of wine pigments. Phytochemistry 10:2175–2186.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    Vidal, S., D. Cartalade, J. Souquet, H. Fulcrand, and V. Cheynier. 2002. Changes in proanthocyanidin chain-length in wine-like model solutions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50:2261–2266.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Vidal, S., E. Meudec, V. Cheynier, G. Skouroumounis, and Y. Hayasaka. 2004. Mass spectrometric evidence for the existence of oligomeric anthocyanins in grape skins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52: 7144–7151.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    Wildenradt, H.L., and V.L. Singleton. 1974. The production of acetaldehyde as a result of oxidation of phenolic compounds and its relation to wine aging. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 25:119–126.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 57 Issue 3

  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phenolic Reactions during Winemaking and Aging
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Phenolic Reactions during Winemaking and Aging
Hélène Fulcrand, Montserrat Dueñas, Erika Salas, Véronique Cheynier
Am J Enol Vitic.  2006  57: 289-297  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.3.289
Hélène Fulcrand
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fulcrand@ensam.inra.fr
Montserrat Dueñas
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika Salas
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Véronique Cheynier
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Phenolic Reactions during Winemaking and Aging
Hélène Fulcrand, Montserrat Dueñas, Erika Salas, Véronique Cheynier
Am J Enol Vitic.  2006  57: 289-297  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2006.57.3.289
Hélène Fulcrand
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fulcrand@ensam.inra.fr
Montserrat Dueñas
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika Salas
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Véronique Cheynier
1INRA, UMR Sciences pour l’Œnologie, 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France; 2Facultad de Ciencias Quimicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Chihuahua, 31170, Mexico.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Polyphenol and Flavonoid Reactions
    • Anthocyanin Reactions
    • Flavanol Reactions
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Glucose and Ethanol Tolerant Enzymes Produced by Pichia (Wickerhamomyces) Isolates from Enological Ecosystems
  • Sensory and Chemical Characterization of Phenolic Polymers from Red Wine Obtained by Gel Permeation Chromatography
  • N, P, and K Supply to Pinot noir Grapevines: Impact on Vine Nutrient Status, Growth, Physiology, and Yield
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue
  • Print on Demand
  • Print on Demand

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire