Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Magnitude and Interaction of Viticultural and Enological Effects. I. Impact of Canopy Management and Yeast Strain on Sensory and Chemical Composition of Chardonnay Musqué

Andrew G. Reynolds, James Schlosser, Robert Power, Richard Roberts, James Willwerth, Christiane de Savigny
Am J Enol Vitic. March 2007 58: 12-24; published ahead of print March 01, 2007
Andrew G. Reynolds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
James Schlosser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Power
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Roberts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
James Willwerth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Christiane de Savigny
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Chardonnay Musqué vines in Ontario were subjected to hedging (control), basal leaf removal (BLR), or cluster thinning (CT) over a 3-year period. Musts from each treatment were combined in a factorial treatment arrangement with yeast strains VL1, EC1118, and EC1118 + enzyme preparation AR2000. Yield was reduced by 21 to 36% by CT as a result of cluster removal. Fruit maturity was advanced by BLR and CT in reduced berry, must, and wine titratable acidity (TA); increased berry and must pH and Brix; increased must and wine free volatile terpenes (FVT) (CT only); and increased berry, must, and wine potentially volatile terpenes (PVT). VL1 wines were lower in pH and both FVT and PVT (1 of 3 years) than those of EC1118 and had higher TA (1 of 3 years). EC1118 + AR2000 wines did not differ from wines produced solely with EC1118 in terms of TA and FVT but were higher in PVT and pH. CT wines differed from BLR and control wines sensorially, with increased depth of color, higher sweetness and herbaceous/grassy aroma, and reduced tropical fruit aroma. BLR wines had higher tropical fruit and floral aromas, while control wines had greater acidity. Principal component analysis of sensory data suggested that variation in wine sensory profiles was due to both viticultural and enological practices.

  • cluster thinning
  • enzymes
  • leaf removal
  • monoterpenes
  • wine quality
  • yeast
  • Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
View Full Text

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 58 Issue 1

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Magnitude and Interaction of Viticultural and Enological Effects. I. Impact of Canopy Management and Yeast Strain on Sensory and Chemical Composition of Chardonnay Musqué
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Magnitude and Interaction of Viticultural and Enological Effects. I. Impact of Canopy Management and Yeast Strain on Sensory and Chemical Composition of Chardonnay Musqué
Andrew G. Reynolds, James Schlosser, Robert Power, Richard Roberts, James Willwerth, Christiane de Savigny
Am J Enol Vitic.  March 2007  58: 12-24;  published ahead of print March 01, 2007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Magnitude and Interaction of Viticultural and Enological Effects. I. Impact of Canopy Management and Yeast Strain on Sensory and Chemical Composition of Chardonnay Musqué
Andrew G. Reynolds, James Schlosser, Robert Power, Richard Roberts, James Willwerth, Christiane de Savigny
Am J Enol Vitic.  March 2007  58: 12-24;  published ahead of print March 01, 2007
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Predicting Berry Quality Attributes in cv. Xarel·lo Rain-Fed Vineyards Using Narrow-Band Reflectance-Based Indices
  • Grapevine Crown Gall Suppression Using Biological Control and Genetic Engineering: A Review of Recent Research
  • Effect of Winery Yeast Lees on Touriga Nacional Red Wine Color and Tannin Evolution
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Temecula Wines Wonderful Nurseries J. Lohr Silverado Nuveen Natural Capital

AJEV Content

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2022 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire