Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

Influence of Grapevine Training Systems on Vine Growth and Fruit Composition: A Review

Andrew G. Reynolds, Justine E. Vanden Heuvel
Am J Enol Vitic. September 2009 60: 251-268; published ahead of print September 01, 2009
Andrew G. Reynolds
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Justine E. Vanden Heuvel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1

    Common grape training systems. Systems can be classified as head/cane, head/spur, cordon/cane, or cordon/spur (Winkler et al. 1974). Arrows denote direction of shoot growth. Figure credits: Scott Henry and vertikokordon (Vanden Heuvel et al. 2004b); Keuka high renewal (Howell et al. 1991); lyre (Adelsheim 1991); all others (Reynolds 1983) (permission to reproduce granted by the publishers and/or authors).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Summary of training system effects on yield, fruitfulness, fruit composition, and canopy microclimate of grapevines (NM: not measured). Abbreviations: 4AK, 4-arm Kniffin; 6AK, 6-arm Kniffin; GDC, Geneva double curtain; HRU, Hudson River umbrella; MP, minimally pruned; RI, Ravaz index: SH, Scott Henry; UK, umbrella Kniffin; VSP, vertical shoot-positioned.

    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 60 Issue 3

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of Grapevine Training Systems on Vine Growth and Fruit Composition: A Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Influence of Grapevine Training Systems on Vine Growth and Fruit Composition: A Review
Andrew G. Reynolds, Justine E. Vanden Heuvel
Am J Enol Vitic.  September 2009  60: 251-268;  published ahead of print September 01, 2009

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Influence of Grapevine Training Systems on Vine Growth and Fruit Composition: A Review
Andrew G. Reynolds, Justine E. Vanden Heuvel
Am J Enol Vitic.  September 2009  60: 251-268;  published ahead of print September 01, 2009
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • General Aspects of Training Grapevines
    • Impacts of Training on Canopy Environment
    • Impacts on Yield and Yield Components
    • Impacts on Fruit Composition
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Grapevine Crown Gall Suppression Using Biological Control and Genetic Engineering: A Review of Recent Research
  • Effect of Winery Yeast Lees on Touriga Nacional Red Wine Color and Tannin Evolution
  • Evaluation of Nonvolatile Flavor Compounds in Vidal Icewine from China
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2021 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire