Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Technical Brief

Assessment of Potential Effects of Common Fining Agents Used for White Wine Protein Stabilization

Ricardo Chagas, Sara Monteiro, Ricardo Boavida Ferreira
Am J Enol Vitic. December 2012 63: 574-578; published ahead of print August 17, 2012 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2012.12016
Ricardo Chagas
1Departamento de Recursos Naturais Ambiente e Território, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Technical University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rchagas@isa.utl.pt
Sara Monteiro
1Departamento de Recursos Naturais Ambiente e Território, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Technical University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
3CEV, Biotecnologia das Plantas, S.A., Rua José Vicente Gonçalves 8H, Parque Industrial do Seixal, 2840-068 Aldeia de Paio Pires, Portugal.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo Boavida Ferreira
1Departamento de Recursos Naturais Ambiente e Território, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Technical University of Lisbon, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
2Disease & Stress Biology Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, New University of Lisbon, 2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal
3CEV, Biotecnologia das Plantas, S.A., Rua José Vicente Gonçalves 8H, Parque Industrial do Seixal, 2840-068 Aldeia de Paio Pires, Portugal.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A variety of fining agents are commercially available to the wine industry, including proteins and inorganic ion exchangers. These fining agents are essentially used to control the levels of phenolics in wine, but they also have the potential to interact with other wine components, most often as a side effect. They are therefore expected to influence, at least in part, the potential for wine protein haze formation. Six common fining agents—casein, egg albumin, isinglass, chitosan, chitin, and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP)—were analyzed to assess their effects on wine protein haze-forming potential and on the levels of proteins and phenolic compounds in a Muscat of Alexandria wine. Bentonite was selected as the positive control, whereas nonfined wine was used as the negative control. Differential results were detected among the selected fining agents when compared to the controls. Egg albumin and chitosan, although incapable of stabilizing the wine, originated a small but significant decrease in the protein haze formed, whereas chitosan and PVPP were second to bentonite in removing the most polyphenols from the wine. Thus, while chitosan fining removes a fraction of polyphenols from the wine and seems to induce a small decrease in its haze-forming potential, PVPP eliminates more polyphenols while leaving its haze-forming potential unaltered. The fining agents analyzed did not significantly affect wine protein content but did remove considerable levels of polyphenols and presented no apparent effect on protein stabilization of the fined wines. Results show that these fining agents do not contribute significantly to protein stabilization in white wines, confirming that bentonite was the most effective agent in wine protein stabilization.

  • fining agent
  • haze
  • polyphenol
  • protein
  • white wine
  • wine
  • ©2012 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
View Full Text

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 63 Issue 4

  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Potential Effects of Common Fining Agents Used for White Wine Protein Stabilization
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Assessment of Potential Effects of Common Fining Agents Used for White Wine Protein Stabilization
Ricardo Chagas, Sara Monteiro, Ricardo Boavida Ferreira
Am J Enol Vitic.  December 2012  63: 574-578;  published ahead of print August 17, 2012 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2012.12016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Assessment of Potential Effects of Common Fining Agents Used for White Wine Protein Stabilization
Ricardo Chagas, Sara Monteiro, Ricardo Boavida Ferreira
Am J Enol Vitic.  December 2012  63: 574-578;  published ahead of print August 17, 2012 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2012.12016
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Effects of High Temperatures on the Efficacy of Potassium Polyaspartate for Tartaric Stabilization in Wines
  • Inhibition of Polyphenol Oxidase by Quercetin Derivatives in Grape Skin
  • Environmental Impact of Wine Aging Process in Oak Barrels in Wineries of La Rioja (Spain)
Show more Technical Brief

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire