Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Article

Comparison of Two PCR-Based Genetic Fingerprinting Methods for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Saccharomyces Strains

Yanlin Liu, Chunxiao Wang, C.M. Lucy Joseph, Linda F. Bisson
Am J Enol Vitic. March 2014 65: 109-116; published ahead of print October 15, 2013 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13056
Yanlin Liu
1College of Enology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China
2Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Chunxiao Wang
1College of Enology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
C.M. Lucy Joseph
2Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda F. Bisson
2Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lfbisson@ucdavis.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Two molecular methods, interdelta polymorphism fingerprinting of genomic DNA and COX1 intron polymorphism fingerprinting of mitochondrial DNA, were used to characterize 52 strains of Saccharomyces identified to species by 26S rDNA sequencing only in order to assess the potential of these techniques for strain typing and genetic analysis individually and in combination. Two laboratory isolates derived from the same parentage served as a control. Forty-seven S. cerevisiae strains representing a mix of commercial strains and vineyard or winery isolates were used. Five of these strains have been given the commercial designation S. cerevisiae race bayanus. Three strains were identified as S. bayanus, S. kudriavzevii, and S. servazzii from their 26S rDNA sequence and thus may be hybrids. Forty-four genetic patterns were found among the strains by interdelta polymorphism fingerprinting and 47 genetic patterns were found by COX1 intron polymorphism fingerprinting. Each method allowed differentiation of the majority of strains but grouped strains into different clusters. Strains were clustered into eight groups using both techniques in combination. The two laboratory strains clustered together but were in a larger grouping of wine strains. Saccharomyces bayanus, S. kudriavzevii, and S. servazzii were separated from each other but each clustered with S. cerevisiae strains and could not be differentiated from S. cerevisiae by either method. Three of the S. cerevisiae race bayanus strains clustered together but the other two were in different groupings. Of the 10 commercial strains, 904 (French Red) was grouped alone, while 522 (Montrachet) and 905 (Premier Cuvee) were grouped with wild isolates from different areas. Thus both methods reveal patterns of strain similarity but neither method differentiated strains by species or by origin.

  • Saccharomyces
  • genetic relatedness
  • interdelta polymorphism fingerprinting
  • COX1 intron polymorphism fingerprinting
  • ©2014 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
View Full Text

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 65 Issue 1

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Two PCR-Based Genetic Fingerprinting Methods for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Saccharomyces Strains
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Comparison of Two PCR-Based Genetic Fingerprinting Methods for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Saccharomyces Strains
Yanlin Liu, Chunxiao Wang, C.M. Lucy Joseph, Linda F. Bisson
Am J Enol Vitic.  March 2014  65: 109-116;  published ahead of print October 15, 2013 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13056

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Comparison of Two PCR-Based Genetic Fingerprinting Methods for Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Saccharomyces Strains
Yanlin Liu, Chunxiao Wang, C.M. Lucy Joseph, Linda F. Bisson
Am J Enol Vitic.  March 2014  65: 109-116;  published ahead of print October 15, 2013 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2013.13056
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Autonomous Phenological Development in Different Merlot Grapevine Shoots
  • Spatial Roguing Reduces the Incidence of Leafroll Disease and Curtails its Spread in a Finger Lakes ‘Cabernet Franc’ Vineyard
  • Electrical Stimulation as a Potential Technique for Enlarging Table Grape Berry Size by Enhancing Cell Division
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement

1 1

AJEV Content

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2022 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire