Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Article

Effects of Various Vineyard Floor Management Techniques on Weed Community Shifts and Grapevine Water Relations

Kerri L. Steenwerth, Arturo Calderón-Orellana, Robert C. Hanifin, Chris Storm, Andrew J. McElrone
Am J Enol Vitic. April 2016 67: 153-162; published ahead of print January 05, 2016 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2015.15050
Kerri L. Steenwerth
1USDA/ARS Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Arturo Calderón-Orellana
1USDA/ARS Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, CA
2Department of Engineering and Soils, University of Chile, Chile
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert C. Hanifin
1USDA/ARS Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Storm
3Vino Farms, Inc., Lodi, CA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. McElrone
1USDA/ARS Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: andrew.mcelrone@ars.usda.gov
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Adoption of permanent cover crops and no-till systems is considered integral to achieving the California state air quality standards regulating airborne particulate matter, as indicated in Senate Bill 656. Imposition of such management techniques in a vineyard could create competition with vines for limited water resources. We evaluated the effects of cover crops that were either tilled or just mowed on vineyard floor composition, weed populations, vine water relations and growth, and fruit composition over three years within a mature commercial Merlot vineyard subjected to deficit irrigation in Lodi, San Joaquin Valley, California. The vineyard floor in this experiment supported resident vegetation that was tilled (standard grower practice), an oat cover crop, or a legume/oat cover crop. The two planted cover crops were either tilled or mowed (i.e., no-till). Biomass of cover crops, weeds, and legumes varied by year and treatment, but consistent effects among treatments were not observed. Weed species composition and cover segregated with the presence or absence of tillage rather than cover crop type and the weed species composition of the resident vegetation was distinct from those in the cover crop treatments. Some treatments, like ‘Oats/Legumes + NoTill’, ‘Oats + NoTill’, ‘Oats/Legumes + Till’, and ‘Resident Vegetation + Till’ reduced soil water content (Өv) in at least one of the three shallow soil layers spanning 0 to 30 cm, 30 to 60 cm, and 60 to 100 cm in 2008, and ‘Oats/Legumes + NoTill’ also dried the two upper layers in 2009, but these differences had no consistent influence on plant water status. Distinctions in Өv between years were attributed partly to the cessation of rainfall two months earlier in 2008 than in 2009, despite similar total annual quantities. Significant reductions in Өv imposed by the ‘Oats/Legumes + NoTill’ treatments reduced vine vegetative growth in two of three years, but these effects did not manifest in yield and fruit composition. Values for the Ravaz index for two of the three years indicate that the vineyard was overcropped for all treatments, but maximizing production in this region is a common practice. Weak competitive effects of the cover crops for water were likely associated with the use of a well-established mature vineyard and demonstrated that these management strategies could be employed to improve air quality to meet California air quality regulations with limited effects on vine water status and production.

  • legume
  • no-till
  • permanent cover crops
  • soil nitrogen availability
  • tillage
  • vineyards
  • ©2016 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
View Full Text

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 67 Issue 2

  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Various Vineyard Floor Management Techniques on Weed Community Shifts and Grapevine Water Relations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Effects of Various Vineyard Floor Management Techniques on Weed Community Shifts and Grapevine Water Relations
Kerri L. Steenwerth, Arturo Calderón-Orellana, Robert C. Hanifin, Chris Storm, Andrew J. McElrone
Am J Enol Vitic.  April 2016  67: 153-162;  published ahead of print January 05, 2016 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2015.15050

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Effects of Various Vineyard Floor Management Techniques on Weed Community Shifts and Grapevine Water Relations
Kerri L. Steenwerth, Arturo Calderón-Orellana, Robert C. Hanifin, Chris Storm, Andrew J. McElrone
Am J Enol Vitic.  April 2016  67: 153-162;  published ahead of print January 05, 2016 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2015.15050
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Phenological Stage and Tissue Type of Grapevines Impact Concentrations and Variability of Mineral Nutrients
  • Machine-Learning Methods for the Identification of Key Predictors of Site-Specific Vineyard Yield and Vine Size
  • Diversity of Wild Yeasts During Spontaneous Fermentation of Wines from Local Grape Varieties in Turkey
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire