Organic and Biodynamic Viticulture Affect Biodiversity and Properties of Vine and Wine: A Systematic Quantitative Review

Supplemental Table 1  Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analyses and meta-regressions.

Supplemental Table 2   Results of the balanced fixed factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test for the analysis of pruning weight, yield, and total soluble solids in juice comparing integrated or conventional and organic or biodynamic viticulture.

Supplemental Figure 1   Ratio of pruning weight under organic compared to conventional management for every single study included in the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Bars express the distribution of the ratio of pruning weight for organic compared to conventional viticulture for every single study. Median Z with percentile Q0%, Q25%, Q75%, and Q100%, respectively (Köhler et al. 2007). Outliers are expressed as dots.

Supplemental Figure 2   Ratio of yield under organic compared to conventional management for every single study included in the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Bars express the distribution of the ratio of yield for organic compared to conventional viticulture for every single study. Median Z with percentile Q0%, Q25%, Q75%, and Q100%, respectively (Köhler et al. 2007). Outliers are expressed as dots.

Supplemental Figure 3   Ratio of total soluble solids under organic compared to conventional management for every single study included in the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Bars express the distribution of the ratio of total soluble solids in juice for organic compared to conventional viticulture for every single study. Median Z with percentile Q0%, Q25%, Q75%, and Q100%, respectively (Köhler et al. 2007). Outliers are expressed as dots.

Files in this Data Supplement:

• Supplemental_Data.pdf