Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Other Publications
    • Catalyst
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Article

Proximal Sensing and Relationships to Soil and Vine Water Status, Yield, and Berry Composition in Ontario Vineyards

Elena Kotsaki, Andrew G. Reynolds, Ralph Brown, Marilyne Jollineau, Hyun-Suk Lee, Emily Aubie
Am J Enol Vitic. April 2020 71: 114-131; published ahead of print December 16, 2019 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2019.19018
Elena Kotsaki
1Graduate Research Assistant, Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew G. Reynolds
2Professor of Viticulture, Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON
7Present Address: 613 Memorial Drive, Fenwick, ON L0S1C0, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: andrewreynolds2007@gmail.com
Ralph Brown
3Adjunct Professor, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Marilyne Jollineau
4Professor of Geography, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Hyun-Suk Lee
5Technical Assistant, Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Aubie
6Postdoctoral Fellow, Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • Supplemental Tables
    • Supplemental Table 1  Basic statistics for yield components, berry composition, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for the Cave Spring Riesling vineyard, Beamsville, Ontario, 2014 to 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 2   Basic statistics for yield components, berry composition, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for the Lambert Riesling vineyard, Virgil, Ontario, 2014 to 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 3   Basic statistics for yield components, berry composition, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for the Cave Spring Cabernet franc vineyard, Beamsville, Ontario, 2014 to 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 4   Basic statistics for yield components, berry composition, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for the Lambert Cabernet franc vineyard, Virgil, Ontario, 2014 to 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 5   Basic statistics for yield components, berry composition, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for Coyote's Run North-South (N-S) vineyard, St. David's, Ontario, 2014 to 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 6  Basic statistics for yield components, berry composition, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for Coyote's Run East-West (E-W) vineyard, St. David's, Ontario, 2014 to 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 7   Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Cave Spring Riesling 2014 to 2015. Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. February bud (LT50) was not collected in 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 8  Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Lambert Riesling 2014 to 2015. Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. Vine size and January bud (LT50) were only collected in 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 9   Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Cave Spring Cabernet franc 2014 to 2015. Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. February bud (LT50) was not collected in 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 10   Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Lambert Cabernet franc 2014 to 2015. Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. February bud (LT50) was not collected in 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 11   Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Coyote's Run (North-South) 2014 to 2015. Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. February bud (LT50) was not collected in 2015.
    • Supplemental Table 12   Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Coyote's Run (East-West) 2014 to 2015: Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. February bud (LT50) was not collected in 2015.

    Supplemental Figures
    • Supplemental Figure 1   Maps of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) measurements for Cave Spring Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 2   Maps of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) measurements for Lambert Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 3   Maps of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) measurements for Cave Spring Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 4   Maps of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) measurements for Lambert Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 5   Maps of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) measurements for Coyote's Run Pinot noir North/South in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 6   Maps of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) measurements for Coyote's Run Pinot noir East/West in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 7   Maps of yield (kg/vine), berry weight (g/100 berries), cluster weight (kg), and vine size (kg/vine) for Cave Spring Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 8   Maps of yield (kg/vine), berry weight (g/100 berries), cluster weight (kg), and vine size (kg/vine) for Lambert Riesling in 2014 and 2015. Pruning weights were not collected in 2014.
    • Supplemental Figure 9   Maps of yield (kg/vine), berry weight (g/100 berries), cluster weight (kg), and vine size (kg/vine)for Cave Spring Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 10   Maps of yield (kg/vine), berry weight (g/100 berries), cluster weight (kg), and vine size (kg/vine) for Lambert Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 11   Maps of yield (kg/vine), berry weight (g/100 berries), cluster weight (kg), and vine size (kg/vine) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir North/South in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 12   Maps of yield (kg/vine), berry weight (g), cluster weight (kg), and vine size (kg/vine) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir East/West in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 13   Maps of soluble solids (Brix), pH, and titratable acidity for Cave Spring Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 14   Maps of soluble solids (Brix), pH, and titratable acidity for Lambert Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 15   Maps of soluble solids (Brix), pH, and titratable acidity for Cave Spring Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 16   Maps of soluble solids (Brix), pH, and titratable acidity for Lambert Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 17   Maps of soluble solids (Brix), pH, and titratable acidity for Coyote's Run Pinot noir North/South in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 18   Maps of soluble solids (Brix), pH, and titratable acidity for Coyote's Run Pinot noir East/West in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 19   Maps of the free volatile terpenes (FVT) and potentially volatile terpenes (PVT) for Cave Spring Riesling and Lambert Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 20   Maps of color (au), anthocyanins (mg/L), and phenols (mg/L) for Cave Spring Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 21   Maps of color (au), anthocyanins (mg/L), and phenols (mg/L) for Lambert Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 22   Maps of anthocyanins (mg/L), phenols (mg/L), and color (au) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir North-South in 2014 and 2015.
    • Supplemental Figure 23   Maps of anthocyanins (mg/L), phenols (mg/L), and color (au) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir East/West in 2014 and 2015.


    • Supplemental_Data.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 71 Issue 2

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proximal Sensing and Relationships to Soil and Vine Water Status, Yield, and Berry Composition in Ontario Vineyards
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Proximal Sensing and Relationships to Soil and Vine Water Status, Yield, and Berry Composition in Ontario Vineyards
Elena Kotsaki, Andrew G. Reynolds, Ralph Brown, Marilyne Jollineau, Hyun-Suk Lee, Emily Aubie
Am J Enol Vitic.  April 2020  71: 114-131;  published ahead of print December 16, 2019 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2019.19018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Proximal Sensing and Relationships to Soil and Vine Water Status, Yield, and Berry Composition in Ontario Vineyards
Elena Kotsaki, Andrew G. Reynolds, Ralph Brown, Marilyne Jollineau, Hyun-Suk Lee, Emily Aubie
Am J Enol Vitic.  April 2020  71: 114-131;  published ahead of print December 16, 2019 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2019.19018
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Autonomous Phenological Development in Different Merlot Grapevine Shoots
  • Spatial Roguing Reduces the Incidence of Leafroll Disease and Curtails its Spread in a Finger Lakes ‘Cabernet Franc’ Vineyard
  • Electrical Stimulation as a Potential Technique for Enlarging Table Grape Berry Size by Enhancing Cell Division
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement

1 1

AJEV Content

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2022 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire