Data supplements
Supplemental Tables
• Supplemental Table 1 Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Cave Spring Riesling 2014 and 2015, including Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. February bud LT50 was not collected in 2015.
• Supplemental Table 2 Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Lambert Riesling 2014 and 2015, including Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are indicated for the corresponding attribute. Vine size and January bud LT50 were collected in 2015 only.
• Supplemental Table 3 Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Cave Spring Cabernet franc 2014 and 2015, including Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are checked for the corresponding attribute, February bud LT50 was not collected in 2015.
• Supplemental Table 4 Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Lambert Cabernet franc 2014 and 2015, including Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are checked for the corresponding attribute. February bud LT50 was not collected in 2015.
• Supplemental Table 5 Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Coyote's Run (North-South) 2014 and 2015, including Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are checked for the corresponding attribute. February bud LT50 was not collected in 2015.
• Supplemental Table 6 Spatial autocorrelation (Moran's I) results for Coyote's Run (East-West) 2014 and 2015, including Moran's I Index values, z-scores, and p value. Patterns are expressed as clustered, dispersed, or random and are checked for the corresponding attribute. February bud LT50 was not collected in 2015.Supplemental Figures
• Supplemental Figure 1 Maps of surface soil water content (% soil moisture; SM) for Cave Spring Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 2 Maps of leaf water potential (LWP; MPa) for Cave Spring Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 3 Maps of surface soil water content (% soil moisture) for Lambert Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 4 Maps of leaf water potential (LWP; MPa) for Lambert Riesling in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 5 Maps of surface soil water content (% soil moisture) for the Cave Spring Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 6 Maps of leaf water potential (LWP; MPa) for Cave Spring Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 7 Maps of surface soil water content (% soil moisture) for Lambert Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 8 Maps of leaf water potential (LWP; MPa) for Lambert Cabernet franc in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 9 Maps of surface soil water content (% soil moisture; SM) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir North/South in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 10 Maps of leaf water potential (LWP; MPa) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir North/South in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 11 Maps of surface soil water content (% soil moisture; SM) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir East/West in 2014 and 2015.
• Supplemental Figure 12 Maps of leaf water potential (LWP; MPa) for Coyote's Run Pinot noir East/West in 2014 and 2015.