Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Article

Sensory Evaluation of Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon Wines: Effects of Harvest Maturity and Prefermentation Soluble Solids

Scott C. Frost, Juan Manuel Sanchez, Caroline Merrell, Richard Larsen, Hildegarde Heymann, James F. Harbertson
Am J Enol Vitic. January 2021 72: 36-45; published ahead of print October 09, 2020 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2020.20035
Scott C. Frost
2School of Food Science, Washington State University, Richland WA, 99354;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Manuel Sanchez
1Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis CA, 95616;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Merrell
3Jackson Family Estates, Santa Rosa, CA, 95043;
4Department of Food Science, Washington State University, Richland WA, 99354.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Larsen
2School of Food Science, Washington State University, Richland WA, 99354;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Hildegarde Heymann
1Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis CA, 95616;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
James F. Harbertson
2School of Food Science, Washington State University, Richland WA, 99354;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jfharbertson@wsu.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Adjusting the soluble solids of the prefermentation must is a tool by which winemakers can manipulate the flavor profile of a wine. Total soluble solids (TSS) are often modified prior to fermentation by chaptalization or the addition of water, but can be modified also in the vineyard, by allowing the fruit to further mature on the vine. This work presents the effects of harvest maturity and prefermentation TSS on the flavor profile of Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) and Syrah (SY) wines. Fruit from each cultivar was harvested at three approximate maturity targets: 20 Brix (unripe), 24 Brix (ripe), and 28 Brix (overripe). Must from each harvest was first divided, then the TSS was adjusted to match each of the target maturities; for example, portions of the 24 Brix harvest were adjusted to 20 or 28 Brix. Descriptive analysis found 10 attributes that varied significantly among the CS wines and 14 attributes which varied significantly among the SY wines. Harvest maturity primarily impacted the CS aroma profile, as wines produced from unripe fruit showed increased green aroma, but wines produced from ripe/overripe fruit showed increased jammy berries aroma. Increasing the prefermentation TSS of the CS must increased the intensity of bitterness, hotness, and viscosity, but decreased the sourness. The SY wine flavor profile was impacted heavily by increasing the prefermentation TSS, which showed greater intensities of astringency, ethanol aroma, hot mouthfeel, jammy fruit aroma, rose aroma, solvent aroma, ethanol aroma, and viscous mouthfeel. SY fruit maturity significantly affected astringency and earthy aroma, but an interactive effect between harvest maturity and TSS was found for sulfur, cabbage aroma, and bitterness.

  • Brix
  • Cabernet Sauvignon
  • descriptive analysis
  • harvest maturity
  • ripening
  • sensory
  • Syrah
  • Received May 2020.
  • Revision received August 2020.
  • Revision received August 2020.
  • Accepted August 2020.
  • Copyright © 2021 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture. All rights reserved.
View Full Text

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 72 Issue 1

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sensory Evaluation of Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon Wines: Effects of Harvest Maturity and Prefermentation Soluble Solids
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Sensory Evaluation of Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon Wines: Effects of Harvest Maturity and Prefermentation Soluble Solids
Scott C. Frost, Juan Manuel Sanchez, Caroline Merrell, Richard Larsen, Hildegarde Heymann, James F. Harbertson
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 2021  72: 36-45;  published ahead of print October 09, 2020 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2020.20035

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Sensory Evaluation of Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon Wines: Effects of Harvest Maturity and Prefermentation Soluble Solids
Scott C. Frost, Juan Manuel Sanchez, Caroline Merrell, Richard Larsen, Hildegarde Heymann, James F. Harbertson
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 2021  72: 36-45;  published ahead of print October 09, 2020 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2020.20035
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments:
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Phenological Stage and Tissue Type of Grapevines Impact Concentrations and Variability of Mineral Nutrients
  • Machine-Learning Methods for the Identification of Key Predictors of Site-Specific Vineyard Yield and Vine Size
  • Gibberellic Acid for Table Grape Inflorescence Elongation: Is It Worth It?
Show more Research Articles

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire