Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Article

Field Performance of Winegrape Rootstocks and Fumigation during Establishment of a Chardonnay Vineyard in Washington

Katherine E. East, Inga A. Zasada, Julie Tarara, Michelle M. Moyer
Am J Enol Vitic.  2021  72: 113-125  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2020.20023
Katherine E. East
1Former address: Michigan State University – Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center, Benton Harbor, MI 49022;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michelle.moyer{at}wsu.edu katherine.e.east{at}gmail.com
Inga A. Zasada
2USDA-ARS-Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97330;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Tarara
3Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Prosser, WA 99350;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle M. Moyer
4Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michelle.moyer{at}wsu.edu katherine.e.east{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1

    (A) Vineyard experimental diagram, where a rootstock consists of an entire vineyard row and where half of that row was either fumigated (dark gray) or not fumigated (light gray). Within each vineyard row, three, 10-vine sections were designated for data collection: F (blue) in the fumigated half; NF (yellow), in the nonfumigated half of the row; and NF+ (orange), where ~20,000 additional Meloidogyne hapla eggs were added to vine roots at planting in the NF half of the row. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014, and planting and additional nematode inoculation occurred on 12 May 2015. (B) Foliar glyphosate was applied to kill the existing vines in fall 2014 prior to being removed and replanting. (C) Vineyard rows with NF (yellow) 10-vine section highlighted as an example. (D) In the NF+ plots, vines were inoculated with M. hapla eggs prior to planting.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2

    Dormant vine pruning weights by fumigation (soil) treatment in fall of (A) 2015, (B) 2016, and (C) 2017. Fumigation treatments were fumigated (F), nonfumigated (NF), and nonfumigated inoculated (NF+), where ~20,000 additional Meloidogyne hapla eggs were added to the vines at planting. Rootstock treatments were combined within fumigation treatments because there was no rootstock × fumigation interaction. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014. Planting occurred on 12 May 2015. Error bars are standard error (n = 4). Different letters denote significant differences among treatment means at α = 0.05 using Tukey’s honest significant difference.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3

    Dormant vine pruning weights by rootstock treatment in (A) 2015, (B) 2016, and (C) 2017. Rootstocks were Teleki 5C, 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (101-14 Mgt), Paulsen 1103 (1103 P), Harmony, self-grafted Vitis vinifera Chardonnay (Self-grafted), and own-rooted nongrafted Chardonnay (Own-rooted). All rootstocks were grafted with V. vinifera Chardonnay Foundation Plant Services selection 15 as the scion. Fumigation treatments were combined within rootstock treatments as there was no rootstock × fumigation interaction. Within a graph, different letters denote significant differences among treatment means at α = 0.05 using Tukey’s honest significant difference. Error bars are standard error (n = 4). Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting occurred on 12 May 2015.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 4

    First partial harvest in 2017 with average yield per vine by rootstock treatment (p = 0.003). Rootstocks were Teleki 5C, 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (101-14 Mgt), Paulsen 1103 (1103 P), Harmony, self-grafted Vitis vinifera Chardonnay (Self-grafted), and own-rooted nongrafted Chardonnay (Own-rooted). All rootstocks were grafted with V. vinifera Chardonnay Foundation Plant Services selection 15 as the scion. Fumigation treatments were combined within rootstock treatments as there was no rootstock × fumigation interaction. Within a graph, different letters denote significant differences among treatment means at α = 0.05 using Tukey’s honest significant difference. Error bars are standard error (n = 4). Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting occurred on 12 May 2015.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 5

    Meloidogyne hapla egg population densities (per g root) in (A) fall 2016 by rootstock, (B) fall 2016 by fumigation, (C) fall 2017 by rootstock, and (D) fall 2017 by fumigation. There was no interaction between rootstocks and fumigation, so they are presented separately. Rootstocks were Teleki 5C, 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (101-14 Mgt), Paulsen 1103 (1103 P), Harmony, self-grafted Vitis vinifera Chardonnay (Self-grafted), and own-rooted nongrafted Chardonnay (Own-rooted). All rootstocks were grafted with V. vinifera Chardonnay Foundation Plant Services selection 15 as the scion. Fumigation treatments were fumigated with metam sodium (F), nonfumigated (NF), and nonfumigated inoculated (NF+) with ~20,000 additional M. hapla eggs applied at planting. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting and additional nematode inoculation (NF+) occurred on 12 May 2015. Error bars are standard error (n = 4). Different letters denote significant differences among treatment means at α = 0.05 using Tukey’s honest significant difference.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 6

    Categorical diagram of Meloidogyne hapla (root-knot nematode) management risk over time. Rootstock and fumigation combination M. hapla second-stage juveniles (J2) density categories: 1) less than 50 M. hapla J2/250 g soil (blue; below management threshold), 2) 50 to 150 M. hapla J2/250 g soil (yellow; around proposed management threshold), and 3) more than 150 M. hapla J2/250 g soil (red; above management threshold)) in fall of 2015, 2016, and 2017. Fumigation treatments were fumigated (F), nonfumigated (NF), and nonfumigated inoculated (NF+) with ~20,000 additional M. hapla eggs at planting. Rootstocks were Teleki 5C, 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (101-14 Mgt), Paulsen 1103 (1103 P), Harmony, own-rooted nongrafted Vitis vinifera Chardonnay (Own-rooted), and self-grafted V. vinifera Chardonnay (Self-grafted). Each data point within a treatment combination is the average of n = 4. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting and additional nematode inoculation occurred on 12 May 2015.

  • Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 7

    Higher nematode population densities in the previous growing season negatively impact vine vigor (pruning weights; PW) the following season. Linear regression comparison between ranked PW of vines on susceptible Vitis vinifera Chardonnay roots and the previous year’s ranked Meloidogyne hapla second-stage juveniles (J2) population densities for two growing season cycles: fall 2015 M. hapla J2 densities compared to fall 2016 PW (black circles), and fall 2016 M. hapla J2 densities compared to fall 2017 PW (white circles). 2015 to 2016 regression (solid line): y = 67.3 – 0.5846x, R2 = 0.34, p = 0.003. 2016 to 2017 regression (dashed line): y = 63.7 – 0.5259x, R2 = 0.29, p = 0.006.

  • Figure 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 8

    Cumulative Meloidogyne hapla second-stage juvenile (J2) dosage (in nematode degree days; Noling and Ferris 1987) at sampling time points postplanting (spring 2015). Nematode dosage due to rootstock is far lower on rootstocks than the susceptible Vitis vinifera controls (A), and dosage due to fumigation persists across all three years (B). Each error bar is constructed using 1 standard error from the mean. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting and additional nematode inoculation occurred on 12 May 2015. Error bars are standard error (n = 4). Nematode dosage is a measure of cumulative nematode pressure experienced over time, which is especially important in a perennial system. Rootstocks were Teleki 5C (5C), 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (101-14 Mgt), Paulsen 1103 (1103 P), Harmony, self-grafted V. vinifera Chardonnay (Self-grafted), and own-rooted nongrafted Chardonnay (Own-rooted). All rootstocks were grafted with V. vinifera Chardonnay Foundation Plant Services selection 15 as the scion. Fumigation treatments were fumigated with metam sodium (F), nonfumigated (NF), and nonfumigated inoculated (NF+) with ~20,000 additional M. hapla eggs applied at planting. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting occurred on 12 May 2015.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1

    Average Meloidogyne hapla second-stage juvenile (J2) soil densities (per 250 g soil) at fall and spring sampling dates from fall 2014 to spring 2018. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting on 12 May 2015. Fumigation treatments were fumigated (F), nonfumigated (NF), and nonfumigated inoculated (NF+) with ~20,000 additional M. hapla eggs applied at planting. Rootstocks were Teleki 5C (5C), 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (101-14 Mgt), Paulsen 1103 (1103 P), Harmony, self-grafted Vitis vinifera Chardonnay (self-grafted), and own-rooted nongrafted Chardonnay (own-rooted). All rootstocks were grafted with V. vinifera Chardonnay Foundation Plant Services selection 15 as the scion.

    Table 1
  • Table 2

    Average Xiphinema americanum population densities (per 250 g soil) at fall and spring sampling dates from fall 2014 to spring 2018. Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014, and planting on 12 May 2015. Fumigation treatments were fumigated (F) and nonfumigated (NF). Rootstocks were Teleki 5C (5C), 101-14 Millardet et de Grasset (101-14 Mgt), Paulsen 1103 (1103 P), Harmony, self-grafted Vitis vinifera Chardonnay (self-grafted), and own-rooted nongrafted Chardonnay (own-rooted). All rootstocks were grafted with V. vinifera Chardonnay Foundation Plant Services selection 15 as the scion.

    Table 2

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Table 1   Standard least squares output for Meloidogyne hapla second-stage juvenile (J2) population density as a split-plot with fumigation, rootstock, and fumigation × rootstock as fixed variables, and block × rootstock with block as a random variable (Block is the replicate blocks). Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting on 12 May 2015. Nparm, number of parameters associated with the effect; DF, degrees of freedom associated with the effects test; DFDen, denominator degrees of freedom.

    Supplemental Table 2   Standard least squares output for Xiphinema americanum soil population density as a split-plot with fumigation, rootstock, and fumigation × rootstock as fixed variables, and block × rootstock with block as a random variable (Block is the replicate blocks). Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting on 12 May 2015. Nparm, number of parameters associated with the effect; DF, degrees of freedom associated with the effects test; DFDen, denominator degrees of freedom.

    Supplemental Table 3   Standard least squares output for vine parameters: pruning ratings (fall 2015), pruning weights (fall 2016, fall 2017), and harvest yield (fall 2017) as a split-plot with fumigation, rootstock, fumigation × rootstock, and block × rootstock as fixed variables, and block as a random variable (Block is the replicate blocks). Fumigation occurred on 18 Sept 2014 and planting on 12 May 2015. Nparm, number of parameters associated with the effect; DF, degrees of freedom associated with the effects test; DFDen, denominator degrees of freedom.

    • Supplemental_Data.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 72 Issue 2

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Field Performance of Winegrape Rootstocks and Fumigation during Establishment of a Chardonnay Vineyard in Washington
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Open Access
Field Performance of Winegrape Rootstocks and Fumigation during Establishment of a Chardonnay Vineyard in Washington
Katherine E. East, Inga A. Zasada, Julie Tarara, Michelle M. Moyer
Am J Enol Vitic.  2021  72: 113-125  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2020.20023
Katherine E. East
1Former address: Michigan State University – Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center, Benton Harbor, MI 49022;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michelle.moyer{at}wsu.edu katherine.e.east{at}gmail.com
Inga A. Zasada
2USDA-ARS-Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97330;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Tarara
3Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Prosser, WA 99350;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle M. Moyer
4Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michelle.moyer{at}wsu.edu katherine.e.east{at}gmail.com

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Open Access
Field Performance of Winegrape Rootstocks and Fumigation during Establishment of a Chardonnay Vineyard in Washington
Katherine E. East, Inga A. Zasada, Julie Tarara, Michelle M. Moyer
Am J Enol Vitic.  2021  72: 113-125  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2020.20023
Katherine E. East
1Former address: Michigan State University – Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center, Benton Harbor, MI 49022;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michelle.moyer{at}wsu.edu katherine.e.east{at}gmail.com
Inga A. Zasada
2USDA-ARS-Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR 97330;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Tarara
3Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Prosser, WA 99350;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle M. Moyer
4Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michelle.moyer{at}wsu.edu katherine.e.east{at}gmail.com
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Diversity of Wild Yeasts During Spontaneous Fermentation of Wines from Local Grape Varieties in Turkey
  • Bioprotective Effect of Pichia kluyveri and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Winemaking Conditions
  • Vine Age Affects Vine Performance, Grape and Wine Chemical and Sensory Composition of cv. Zinfandel from California
Show more Research Articles

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2025 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire