Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Article

Fruit Zone Shading to Control Grape Berry Temperature: A Modeling Study

María A. Ponce de León, Brian N. Bailey
Am J Enol Vitic. July 2022 73: 183-197; published ahead of print March 24, 2022 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2022.21054
María A. Ponce de León
1Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian N. Bailey
1Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bnbailey@ucdavis.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data supplements

  • Supplemental Table 1  Summary statistics for 1, 2, and 3 m row spacing treatments and N-S, NE-SW, E-W, and NW-SE row orientations in a flat and sloped terrain for the vertical shoot position. GDH, growing degree hours.

    Supplemental Figure 1  Simulated canopy light interception in the vertical shoot position trellis system with different row spacing (1, 2, and 3 m), row orientation (N-S, NE-SW, E-W, NW-SE), and topography (flat and sloped vineyards facing N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW).

    Supplemental Figure 2  Simulated berry daily interception in the vertical shoot position trellis system with 3 m row spacing with different shade cloth densities (control, 30, 50, and 70%), row orientation (N-S, NE-SW, E-W, NW-SE), and topography (flat and sloped vineyards facing N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW).

    Supplemental Figure 3   Simulated temperature of berries, exposed berries, and berries under shade cloths with three different densities (30, 50, and 70%) positioned on both sides of the vertical shoot position trellis system in rows oriented N-S, NE-SW, E-W, and NW-SE, in three different row spacings (1, 2, and 3 m), in different topographies. The topographies included a flat surface and 30° slopes facing N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW. The dashed lines correspond to berries on the right side of the vine and the solid lines to berries on the left side of the vine.

    Supplemental Figure 4  Simulated temperature difference of berries under shade cloths between both sides of the vine with three different densities (30, 50, and 70%) positioned on both sides of the vertical shoot position trellis system in rows oriented N-S, NE-SW, E-W, and NW-SE, in three different row spacings (1, 2, and 3 m), in different topographies. The topographies included a flat surface and 30° slopes facing N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW.

    Supplemental Figure 5  Simulated berry temperature response to shade cloths with three different densities (30, 50, and 70%) positioned on both sides of the vertical shoot position trellis system in rows oriented N-S, NE-SW, E-W, and NW-SE, in three different row spacings (1, 2, and 3 m), in different topographies. The topographies included a flat surface and 30° slopes facing N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, and NW. The dashed lines correspond to berries on the right side of the vine and the solid lines to berries on the left side of the vine.

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 73 Issue 3

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fruit Zone Shading to Control Grape Berry Temperature: A Modeling Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Fruit Zone Shading to Control Grape Berry Temperature: A Modeling Study
María A. Ponce de León, Brian N. Bailey
Am J Enol Vitic.  July 2022  73: 183-197;  published ahead of print March 24, 2022 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2022.21054

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Fruit Zone Shading to Control Grape Berry Temperature: A Modeling Study
María A. Ponce de León, Brian N. Bailey
Am J Enol Vitic.  July 2022  73: 183-197;  published ahead of print March 24, 2022 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2022.21054
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Phenological Stage and Tissue Type of Grapevines Impact Concentrations and Variability of Mineral Nutrients
  • Machine-Learning Methods for the Identification of Key Predictors of Site-Specific Vineyard Yield and Vine Size
  • Diversity of Wild Yeasts During Spontaneous Fermentation of Wines from Local Grape Varieties in Turkey
Show more Research Articles

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire