Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Insight

Climate Change Impacts on Vineyards in Warm and Dry Areas: Challenges and Opportunities

From the ASEV Climate Change Symposium Part 1 – Viticulture
View ORCID ProfileMarkus Keller
Am J Enol Vitic.  2023  74: 0740033  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2023.23024
Markus Keller
1Department of Viticulture and Enology, Washington State University, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Markus Keller
  • For correspondence: mkeller{at}wsu.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1

    Vineyard in the Yakima Valley of southeastern Washington, a region with ~200 mm annual precipitation, in late July 2021, after two years without irrigation.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2

    Effect of soil type and soil moisture on (A) time to budbreak and (B) shoot vigor of own-rooted Merlot grapevines grown in 27-L pots. Two different soils were collected at the Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center in Prosser, Washington, based on the USDA soil classification (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov), and dried. Dormant, 2-year-old vines grown in potting mix were removed from cold storage, pruned to 10 buds, repotted in the two dry soils, moved into a greenhouse (temperature range 12 to 30°C), and irrigated daily at ~1% (v/v) target increments ranging from permanent wilting point to field capacity in each soil type. Volumetric soil moisture was measured by time-domain reflectometry (HydroSense, Campbell Scientific). Time to budbreak: days from placement in the greenhouse to appearance of green tissue on ≥5 buds. Shoot vigor: average growth rate over the first five weeks after budbreak.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3

    Infrared image superimposed on visible image of a Riesling canopy in the Yakima Valley of Washington in 2020. Rows are oriented north-south, and fruit-zone leaves were removed after fruit set on the east side only. The image was taken with a FLIR ONE Pro for Android camera (Teledyne FLIR). Temperatures are shown for (from top) sun-exposed leaf, shaded leaf, and sun-exposed cluster. The purple band at the bottom is the shaded vineyard floor; the white “hotspot” is the sun-exposed vineyard floor. The ambient air temperature, recorded at 1.5 m by an on-site weather station, was 24°C. For details, see Fritzke (2022). Photo courtesy of Evan Fritzke.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 4

    Cabernet Sauvignon clusters in a vineyard in the Yakima Valley of Washington in 2022. Rows are oriented north-south, and clusters are exposed on (A) west side of the canopy and (B) east side of the same canopy, with (C) sun-exposed side and (D) shaded side of the same cluster on the west side. All pictures were taken on the same day.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 5

    Variation in veraison date of 31 grape cultivars grown in a vineyard in the Yakima Valley of Washington. Veraison date was recorded at 50% color change (black grapes, purple boxes) or 50% softening (white grapes, green boxes) from 2015 through 2022. Box plots show median (vertical line), lower, and upper quartiles (box), and 10th and 90th percentiles (whiskers). Cultivars are ranked by mean date with median date used as tiebreaker. Own-rooted, certified vines were planted in 2003 (Concord, in a separate block) or 2010 at the Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center in Prosser, WA. Vineyard details are provided in Groenveld et al. (2023) and Keller et al. (2023).

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 6

    Machine-pruning and machine-thinning effects in a Syrah vineyard in the Columbia Valley of Washington. (A) Relationship between number of clusters per vine and average cluster weight of manually-pruned or machine-pruned vines with and without machine-thinning. Data for 2014 through 2018 were pooled. (B) Berries, cluster fragments, and leaves on the vineyard floor after machine-thinning. Own-rooted vines were planted in 2000 in a vineyard owned and operated by Ste. Michelle Wine Estates near Paterson, WA. Rows were oriented north/northwest to south/southeast and spaced at 2.74 m. Vines spaced at 1.83 m were trained to unilateral cordons at 1 m and converted from spur pruning to box pruning (10 to 12 cm on either side and above the cordon) in 2013; some rows were converted back to spur pruning in 2014 (24 to 30 buds per vine). Crop thinning was done with a machine harvester (Vinestar 990/500, ground speed 2.5 km/hr, bow-rod frequency 425 rpm) between pea size and lag phase. Treatments were applied to four replicated three-row blocks with four data vines in each middle row.

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 74 Issue 2

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Climate Change Impacts on Vineyards in Warm and Dry Areas: Challenges and Opportunities
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Open Access
Climate Change Impacts on Vineyards in Warm and Dry Areas: Challenges and Opportunities
View ORCID ProfileMarkus Keller
Am J Enol Vitic.  2023  74: 0740033  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2023.23024
Markus Keller
1Department of Viticulture and Enology, Washington State University, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Markus Keller
  • For correspondence: mkeller{at}wsu.edu

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Open Access
Climate Change Impacts on Vineyards in Warm and Dry Areas: Challenges and Opportunities
View ORCID ProfileMarkus Keller
Am J Enol Vitic.  2023  74: 0740033  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2023.23024
Markus Keller
1Department of Viticulture and Enology, Washington State University, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Markus Keller
  • For correspondence: mkeller{at}wsu.edu
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Yield: Drought and Heat May Leave Your Glass Empty
    • Fruit Composition: Temperature Trumps Water Status
    • Growth and Physiology—But Not Phenology: Water Status Trumps Temperature
    • Crop Load: Implications for Ripening and Water-use Efficiency (WUE)
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Adoption of New Winegrape Cultivars to Reduce Pesticide Use in Europe
  • Transmission of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus: A Virologist’s Perspective of the Literature and a Few Recommendations
Show more Insight

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2026 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire