Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Report

Efficient Genetic Transformation of Vitis vinifera L. Mencía using a Hypervirulent Strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and qPCR Determination of Transgene Copy Number

View ORCID ProfileÓscar Martínez, View ORCID ProfileElena Palomo-Ríos, View ORCID ProfileManuel Rey, View ORCID ProfileMaría Victoria González
Am J Enol Vitic.  2024  75: 0750020  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2024.24012
Óscar Martínez
1Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ciencia del Suelo, Campus Universitario, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;
4present address, Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Óscar Martínez
Elena Palomo-Ríos
2Departamento de Botánica y Fisiología Vegetal, Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea La Mayora (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Universidad de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elena Palomo-Ríos
Manuel Rey
1Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ciencia del Suelo, Campus Universitario, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Manuel Rey
María Victoria González
3Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for María Victoria González
  • For correspondence: mvictoria.gonzalez{at}usc.es
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Kanamycin selection strategies used in this study. Transformed somatic embryo aggregates were cultured in selection media composed of induction medium supplemented with 250 mg/L timentin and the indicated kanamycin concentrations (mg/L). The selection strategies were a standard strategy (strategy 1), where aggregates were cultured in selection medium with 50 mg/L kanamycin for 5 wk; an incremental strategy (strategy 2), with 25 mg/L kanamycin for 4 wk followed by 50 mg/L kanamycin for 1 wk; a progressively increasing kanamycin concentration strategy (strategy 3), with 6, 12, 25, 50, and 50 mg/L kanamycin for 1 wk each; and no initial selection strategy (strategy 4), with no kanamycin for 2 wk followed by 50 mg/L kanamycin for 3 wk. After 5 wk, treated somatic embryo aggregates were maintained in the presence of 50 mg/L kanamycin in all strategies.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1

    Kanamycin selection strategies used in this study. Transformed somatic embryo aggregates were cultured in selection media composed of induction medium supplemented with 250 mg/L timentin and the indicated kanamycin concentrations (mg/L). The selection strategies were a standard strategy (strategy 1), where aggregates were cultured in selection medium with 50 mg/L kanamycin for 5 wk; an incremental strategy (strategy 2), with 25 mg/L kanamycin for 4 wk followed by 50 mg/L kanamycin for 1 wk; a progressively increasing kanamycin concentration strategy (strategy 3), with 6, 12, 25, 50, and 50 mg/L kanamycin for 1 wk each; and no initial selection strategy (strategy 4), with no kanamycin for 2 wk followed by 50 mg/L kanamycin for 3 wk. After 5 wk, treated somatic embryo aggregates were maintained in the presence of 50 mg/L kanamycin in all strategies.

  • Effect of kanamycin concentration on growth of Mencía grapevine somatic embryo aggregates in induction medium. A) Variation in fresh weight (final weight − initial weight; mean ± standard error) of somatic embryo aggregates after 4 (white) and 8 (black) wk of culture in induction medium with different concentrations of kanamycin. B) Growth of somatic embryo aggregates in induction medium for 8 wk after treatment with different concentrations of kanamycin. In (A), different letters within the same time of culture (uppercase for data collected after 4 wk of culture, lowercase for data after 8 wk) indicate statistically significant differences between kanamycin concentrations (p < 0.05).
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2

    Effect of kanamycin concentration on growth of Mencía grapevine somatic embryo aggregates in induction medium. A) Variation in fresh weight (final weight − initial weight; mean ± standard error) of somatic embryo aggregates after 4 (white) and 8 (black) wk of culture in induction medium with different concentrations of kanamycin. B) Growth of somatic embryo aggregates in induction medium for 8 wk after treatment with different concentrations of kanamycin. In (A), different letters within the same time of culture (uppercase for data collected after 4 wk of culture, lowercase for data after 8 wk) indicate statistically significant differences between kanamycin concentrations (p < 0.05).

  • Selection and recovery of transformed Mencía grapevine embryogenic material from somatic embryo aggregates cultured in induction medium supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin (selection strategy 1, Figure 1). A) Formation of potentially transformed grapevine Mencía somatic embryos after 2 mo of culture in the presence of kanamycin. B) Growth of Mencía grapevine somatic embryo aggregates after 3 mo of culture in the presence of kanamycin. Bars: 1 mm (A); 1 cm (B).
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3

    Selection and recovery of transformed Mencía grapevine embryogenic material from somatic embryo aggregates cultured in induction medium supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin (selection strategy 1, Figure 1). A) Formation of potentially transformed grapevine Mencía somatic embryos after 2 mo of culture in the presence of kanamycin. B) Growth of Mencía grapevine somatic embryo aggregates after 3 mo of culture in the presence of kanamycin. Bars: 1 mm (A); 1 cm (B).

  • Effect of selection strategy on the transformation efficiency of Mencía grapevine somatic embryo aggregates, indicated as the percentage of embryos showing response after selection treatment. The selection strategies tested were a standard strategy (strategy 1); an incremental strategy (strategy 2); a progressively increasing kanamycin concentration strategy (strategy 3); and no initial selection strategy (strategy 4). After 5 wk, treated somatic embryo aggregates were maintained in the presence of 50 mg/L kanamycin in all strategies. (A) Percentage of aggregates with embryogenic response (mean ± standard error) after each selection strategy. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). (B) Percentage of positive (black; GUS+) or negative (grey; GUS−) for the β-glucuronidase (GUS) histochemical analysis of the transformed embryogenic lines generated in each selection strategy.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 4

    Effect of selection strategy on the transformation efficiency of Mencía grapevine somatic embryo aggregates, indicated as the percentage of embryos showing response after selection treatment. The selection strategies tested were a standard strategy (strategy 1); an incremental strategy (strategy 2); a progressively increasing kanamycin concentration strategy (strategy 3); and no initial selection strategy (strategy 4). After 5 wk, treated somatic embryo aggregates were maintained in the presence of 50 mg/L kanamycin in all strategies. (A) Percentage of aggregates with embryogenic response (mean ± standard error) after each selection strategy. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). (B) Percentage of positive (black; GUS+) or negative (grey; GUS−) for the β-glucuronidase (GUS) histochemical analysis of the transformed embryogenic lines generated in each selection strategy.

  • β-glucuronidase (GUS) histochemical assay in Mencía grapevine somatic embryo transformed lines and regenerated plantlets. (A) Asynchronic somatic embryo aggregates cultured in DM1 differentiation medium. (B) Leaves of plantlets not transformed (left) and transformed (right) grown in conversion medium. Bars: 1 mm (A); 1 cm (B).
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 5

    β-glucuronidase (GUS) histochemical assay in Mencía grapevine somatic embryo transformed lines and regenerated plantlets. (A) Asynchronic somatic embryo aggregates cultured in DM1 differentiation medium. (B) Leaves of plantlets not transformed (left) and transformed (right) grown in conversion medium. Bars: 1 mm (A); 1 cm (B).

  • Relative expression of the uidA gene in Mencía grapevine somatic embryo transformed lines. qPCR data were determined and statistically analyzed (p < 0.05) using REST-2009 with PCR efficiency correction and normalization with two reference genes, then compared with the 2−ΔΔCq method. GAPDH(m) and EF1-α(m) were used as reference genes for normalization and the transformed line with lowest transcript level (T23) was used as the calibrator. The average values of two independent experiments are represented ± the standard error.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 6

    Relative expression of the uidA gene in Mencía grapevine somatic embryo transformed lines. qPCR data were determined and statistically analyzed (p < 0.05) using REST-2009 with PCR efficiency correction and normalization with two reference genes, then compared with the 2−ΔΔCq method. GAPDH(m) and EF1-α(m) were used as reference genes for normalization and the transformed line with lowest transcript level (T23) was used as the calibrator. The average values of two independent experiments are represented ± the standard error.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Primer sources and sequences, amplicon lengths, and efficiency for qPCR assays. Efficiency was determined with LinRegPCR software and the indicated value represents the average of all qPCRs performed.

    Table 1
  • Table 2

    Transformation efficiency after additional selection in liquid medium. Transformed Mencía somatic embryo aggregates treated with each selection strategy in solid media were cultured in liquid induction medium supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin for 5 wk. The final transformation efficiency was calculated as the percentage of embryogenic response observed in each of the initial selection strategies, multiplied by the percentage embryogenic response after selection in liquid medium.

    Table 2
  • Table 3

    Estimation of the number of copies of transgenes nptII and uidA based on the values (mean ± standard error) of ΔCq and modified ΔCq in lines of transformed grapevine somatic embryo aggregates. The grapevine single-copy genes NCED2 and chi were used as the endogenous control genes.

    Table 3
PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 75 Issue 2

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficient Genetic Transformation of Vitis vinifera L. Mencía using a Hypervirulent Strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and qPCR Determination of Transgene Copy Number
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Open Access
Efficient Genetic Transformation of Vitis vinifera L. Mencía using a Hypervirulent Strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and qPCR Determination of Transgene Copy Number
View ORCID ProfileÓscar Martínez, View ORCID ProfileElena Palomo-Ríos, View ORCID ProfileManuel Rey, View ORCID ProfileMaría Victoria González
Am J Enol Vitic.  2024  75: 0750020  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2024.24012
Óscar Martínez
1Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ciencia del Suelo, Campus Universitario, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;
4present address, Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Óscar Martínez
Elena Palomo-Ríos
2Departamento de Botánica y Fisiología Vegetal, Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea La Mayora (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Universidad de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elena Palomo-Ríos
Manuel Rey
1Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ciencia del Suelo, Campus Universitario, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Manuel Rey
María Victoria González
3Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for María Victoria González
  • For correspondence: mvictoria.gonzalez{at}usc.es

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Open Access
Efficient Genetic Transformation of Vitis vinifera L. Mencía using a Hypervirulent Strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and qPCR Determination of Transgene Copy Number
View ORCID ProfileÓscar Martínez, View ORCID ProfileElena Palomo-Ríos, View ORCID ProfileManuel Rey, View ORCID ProfileMaría Victoria González
Am J Enol Vitic.  2024  75: 0750020  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2024.24012
Óscar Martínez
1Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ciencia del Suelo, Campus Universitario, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;
4present address, Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Óscar Martínez
Elena Palomo-Ríos
2Departamento de Botánica y Fisiología Vegetal, Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterránea La Mayora (IHSM-UMA-CSIC), Universidad de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elena Palomo-Ríos
Manuel Rey
1Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ciencia del Suelo, Campus Universitario, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Manuel Rey
María Victoria González
3Departamento de Biología Funcional, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for María Victoria González
  • For correspondence: mvictoria.gonzalez{at}usc.es
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Profiling Aldehydes and Furans in White Wine Oxidation: A Systems Perspective on Bottle Geometry, Cork, and Wine Type
  • Peer Knowledge Networking Groups Facilitate Social Connections, Information Sharing, and Collective Action
  • Annual Nutrient Removal from Irrigated Vineyards in Dry Climates
Show more Research Report

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2026 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire