Data supplements
Supplemental Table 1 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the physicochemical characteristics (classical parameters) of wine.
Supplemental Table 2 Interaction between pruning system and site effect in wine classical parameters.
Supplemental Table 3 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on chromatic characteristics and phenolic composition of wine.
a.u., absorbance units; NTU, nephelometric turbidity units.
Supplemental Table 4 Interaction between pruning system and site effect in wine classical parameters. a.u., absorbance units; NTU, nephelometric turbidity units.
Supplemental Table 5 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the pigments of wine. a.u., absorbance units.
Supplemental Table 6 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the sensory analysis of the wines produced in 2013.
Supplemental Table 7 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the sensory analysis of the wines produced in 2014.
Supplemental Table 8 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the sensory analysis of the wines produced in 2015.
Supplemental Table 9 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the sensory analysis of the wines produced in 2013.
Supplemental Table 10 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the sensory analysis of the wines produced in 2014.
Supplemental Table 11 Effects of pruning system, organic amendment, and site on the sensory analysis of the wines produced in 2015.
Supplemental Table 12 Interaction between pruning system and organic amendments effect in wine sensory analysis.
Supplemental Figure 1 Influence of the site on the relationship between yield and total pigments of Syrah wines. Data represent single treatment (pruning system × organic amendment × site) averages and data were pooled over repetitions: □ - Quinta do Côro (QC); ⚬ - Quinta do Gradil (QG). Regression equations:
y = 0.22x² - 5.06x + 47.28, r² = 0.57, p < 0.0001 (QC);
y = 0.57x² – 10.34x + 62.43, r² = 0.71, p < 0.0001 (QG).
Supplemental Figure 2 Influence of the site on the relationship between yield and total phenols of Syrah wines. Data represent single treatment (pruning system × organic amendment × site) averages and data were pooled over repetitions: □ - Quinta do Côro (QC); ⚬ - Quinta do Gradil (QG). Regression equations:
y = 0.66x² – 13.47x + 106.88, r² = 0.69, p < 0.0001 (QC);
y = -0.29x² – 0.30x + 53.29, r² = 0.68, p = 0.0005 (QG).