Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Research Article

Evaluation of Sample Preparation Practices Common with Differential Thermal Analysis of Grapevine Bud Cold Hardiness

Jason P. Londo, Michelle M. Moyer, Maria Mireles, Lynn Mills, Markus Keller, Beth Ann Workmaster, Amaya Atucha, Al P. Kovaleski
Am J Enol Vitic. September 2022 : ajev.2022.22010; published ahead of print September 21, 2022 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2022.22010
Jason P. Londo
1School of Integrated Plant Science, Horticulture section, Cornell University, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jpl275@cornell.edu
Michelle M. Moyer
2Department of Horticulture, Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 24106 North Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michelle.moyer@wsu.edu
Maria Mireles
2Department of Horticulture, Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 24106 North Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn Mills
2Department of Horticulture, Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 24106 North Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Markus Keller
2Department of Horticulture, Washington State University – Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, 24106 North Bunn Road, Prosser, WA 99350
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Beth Ann Workmaster
3Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53705
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Amaya Atucha
3Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53705
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Al P. Kovaleski
3Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53705
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Differential thermal analysis (DTA) is a popular semi-automated method for determining the temperature at which plant tissues freeze. It is used to evaluate effects of environmental variables, genotypes, and various agronomic practices on cold hardiness, as well as an Extension tool for cold hardiness monitoring and decision support for growers of many specialty crops. The study presented here evaluated common approaches in sampling and preparation of dormant grapevine compound buds for DTA, to provide a reference point as to which adjustments might be cause for excessive variation in subsequent data. We found that common adjustments in sample preparation, whether using foil packets, moistened tissue paper, or bud orientation, resulted in little consistent consequence in observed DTA values, typically resulting in a variation of less than 1°C. The same was true for storage (or shipping conditions) of 24 h or less, provided samples were maintained at low, but above-freezing temperatures (1.6 to 4°C). Finally, influence of bud position along the length of the cane was also not found to be consistent. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the robust nature of DTA for estimating grapevine cold hardiness offsets the potential impact of variation introduced from different sample preparation methods. These results can be used to help those wishing to develop DTA protocols, or expand their capacity to conduct DTA analysis, to better design their laboratory protocols to best suit their individual program needs. Consistency in DTA approach is likely more important than the specific methods used, especially when comparing relative differences in observed lethal temperatures.

  • Cold hardiness
  • controlled freezing
  • endodormancy
  • low temperature exotherm
  • protocol evaluation
  • Vitis
  • Received February 2022.
  • Revision received June 2022.
  • Revision received July 2022.
  • Accepted July 2022.

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

PreviousNext
Back to top
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Sample Preparation Practices Common with Differential Thermal Analysis of Grapevine Bud Cold Hardiness
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Open Access
Evaluation of Sample Preparation Practices Common with Differential Thermal Analysis of Grapevine Bud Cold Hardiness
Jason P. Londo, Michelle M. Moyer, Maria Mireles, Lynn Mills, Markus Keller, Beth Ann Workmaster, Amaya Atucha, Al P. Kovaleski
Am J Enol Vitic.  September 2022  ajev.2022.22010;  published ahead of print September 21, 2022 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2022.22010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Open Access
Evaluation of Sample Preparation Practices Common with Differential Thermal Analysis of Grapevine Bud Cold Hardiness
Jason P. Londo, Michelle M. Moyer, Maria Mireles, Lynn Mills, Markus Keller, Beth Ann Workmaster, Amaya Atucha, Al P. Kovaleski
Am J Enol Vitic.  September 2022  ajev.2022.22010;  published ahead of print September 21, 2022 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.2022.22010
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Phenological Stage and Tissue Type of Grapevines Impact Concentrations and Variability of Mineral Nutrients
  • Machine-Learning Methods for the Identification of Key Predictors of Site-Specific Vineyard Yield and Vine Size
  • Gibberellic Acid for Table Grape Inflorescence Elongation: Is It Worth It?
Show more Research Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire