TY - JOUR T1 - Optimizing Irrigation for Mechanized Concord Juice Grape Production JF - American Journal of Enology and Viticulture JO - Am J Enol Vitic. DO - 10.5344/ajev.2022.21050 SP - ajev.2022.21050 AU - Markus Keller AU - Lynn J. Mills AU - Alan K. Kawakami Y1 - 2022/10/24 UR - http://www.ajevonline.org/content/early/2022/12/08/ajev.2022.21050.abstract N2 - Background and Goals Economic considerations and water shortages associated with climate change are driving the conversion of many hand-pruned and furrow- or sprinkler-irrigated juice grape vineyards in arid eastern Washington to mechanical pruning and drip irrigation. However, juice grape producers have traditionally avoided plant water deficits, fearing a decline in vineyard productivity.Methods and Key Findings We conducted a 6-year field trial to test the impact of eight drip-irrigation treatments on large, mechanically-pruned Concord grapes. We found an estimated crop coefficient of 1.05 between fruit set and harvest. Replacing 75% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) from fruit set through harvest reduced annual irrigation water supply by 20% compared with the 100% ETc control without altering canopy size, yield, and juice composition. Decreasing the water supply from 100% to 50% ETc at veraison saved only 8% irrigation water, while irrigating at 50% ETc from fruit set through veraison and 100% ETc thereafter reduced irrigation water use by 30% but decreased canopy size and reduced yield by 14%. Replacing 150% of ETc between fruit set and veraison increased seasonal water use by 20% but did not alter yield or juice composition.Conclusions and Significance Deficit irrigation does not impact crop yield and juice composition, so long as vines experience only mild water stress (midday stem water potential > −1 MPa) before veraison. Irrigating at 75% ETc to impose mild preveraison water stress and mild to moderate postveraison stress optimally balances the goals of water conservation and yield and quality sustainability in juice grape production. ER -