TY - JOUR T1 - Micropropagation of the Grapevine: Results of 10 Years of Experiments in the Champagne Vineyard and Results of the First Vinifications JF - American Journal of Enology and Viticulture JO - Am J Enol Vitic. SP - 571 LP - 578 DO - 10.5344/ajev.1995.46.4.571 VL - 46 IS - 4 AU - A. Deloire AU - M. Charpentier AU - G. Berlioz AU - A. Colin AU - G. Gimonnet Y1 - 1995/01/01 UR - http://www.ajevonline.org/content/46/4/571.abstract N2 - The traditional technique of grapevine propagation through woody grafting multiplication could be usefully complemented by the in vitro micro-propagation process and by the green grafting method. In this work, the possibilities and limits of the in vitro propagation process were studied. About two hectares of experimental in vitro grapevines were planted in a Champagne vineyard, and their viticultural and enological characteristics were studied over a period of 10 years. Compared to control vines, no morphological difference and no phylloxera damage were observed on the 41B (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas x Vitis berlandieri) and 333EM (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon x Vitis berlandieri) from in vitro propagated vines, planted in the field in 1985, after the plants had reached eight years of age. However, some leaves and one-year-old stem of in vitro propagated Chardonnay and Pinot noir vines showed some vegetative differences compared to the control vines. As a consequence of poor flower differentiation, the in vitro grapevine production was about 50% lower than the production from control vines for the four first years, but the developed berries were normal (shape, size, maturity). All abnormal differences progressively disappeared after seven years. In vitro and control fermentation and tasting results from 1989 to 1993 were similar. No significant preferences in Chardonnay and Pinot noir base wines from micro-propagation and control grapevines were detected by a panel of trained judges. ER -