Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of the osmotic-stress response inSaccharomyces cerevisiae: osmotic stress and glucose repression regulate glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase independently

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Current Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Micro-organisms have developed systems to adapt to sudden changes in the environment. Here we describe the response of the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic stress. A drop in the water activity (aw) of the medium following the addition of NaCl led to an immediate shrinkage of the cells. During the 2 h following the osmotic shock the cells partially restored their cell volume. This process depended on active protein synthesis. During the recovery period the cells accumulated glycerol intracellularly as a compatible solute and very little glycerol was leaking out of the cell. We have investigated in more detail the enzymes of glycerol metabolism and found that only the cytoplasmic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was strongly induced. The level of induction was dependent on the yeast strain used and the degree of osmotic stress. The synthesis of cytoplasmic glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is also regulated by glucose repression. Using mutants defective in glucose repression (hxk2Δ), or derepression (snf1Δ), and with invertase as a marker enzyme, we show that glucose repression and the osmotic-stress response system regulate glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase synthesis independently. We infer that specific control mechanisms sense the osmotic situation of the cell and induce responses such as the production and retention of glycerol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler L, Blomberg LA, Nilsson A (1985) J Bacteriol 162:300–306

    Google Scholar 

  • André L, Hemming A, Adler L (1991) FEBS Lett 286:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg A, Adler L (1992) Adv Microbiol Physiol 33:145–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AD (1978) Adv Microbiol Physiol 17:181–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AD, Mackenzie KF, Singh KK (1986) FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson M, Botstein D (1982) Cell 28:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Celenza JL, Carlson M (1986) Science 233:1175–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy M (1977) Mol Gen Genet 154:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck JH van, Prior BA, Brandt EV (1989) J Gen Microbiol 135:3505–3513

    Google Scholar 

  • Entian K-D, Zimmermann FK (1982) J Bacteriol 151:1113–1118

    Google Scholar 

  • Entian K-D, Zimmermann FK, Scheel I (1977) Mol Gen Genet 156:99–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Gancedo C, Serrano R (1989) In: Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds) The yeasts, vol 3 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 205–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Gancedo C, Gancedo JM, Sols A (1968) Eur J Biochem 5:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein A, Lampen JO (1975) Methods Enzymol 42:504–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann S, Zimmermann FK (1986) Curr Genet 11:217–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann S, Neves MJ, de Koning W, Alijo R, Ramos J, Thevelein JM (1993) Curr Genet 23:281–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbart EJA, Yang X, Carlson M (1992) Genetics 130:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Laere A van (1989) FEMS Microbiol Rev 63:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin ECC, Koch JP, Chused TM, Jorgensen SE (1962) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 48:2145–2150

    Google Scholar 

  • May JW, Marshall JH, Sloan J (1982) J Gen Microbiol 128:1763–1766

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehlin JO, Ronne H (1990) EMBO J 9:2891–2898

    Google Scholar 

  • Nover L (1991) Heat-shock response. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Onishi H, Shiromaru Y (1984) FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:175–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior BA, Casaleggio C, Vuuren HJJ van (1977) J Food Protect 40:537–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RA, Stokes RH (1959) Electrolyte solutions, 2nd edn. Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose M, Albig W, Entian K-D (1991) Eur J Biochem 199:511–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman F, Fink GR, Hicks JB (1986) Methods in yeast genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague GF, Cronan JE (1977) J Bacteriol 129:1335–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BJ, Rothstein R (1989) Cell 56:619–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushio K, Motoko S, Nakata Y (1991) J Ferment Bioeng 71:390–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhalewyn M, Thevelein JM (1992) Yeast 8 (special issue): S 391

  • Wiemken A (1990) Ant van Leeuwenhoek 58:209–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamenhof S (1957) Methods Enzymol 3:696–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyl PJ van, Prior BA (1990) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyl PJ van, Kilian SG, Prior BA (1990) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 34:231–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyl PJ van, Prior BA, Kilian SG (1991) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 36:369–374

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by K. Wolf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Albertyn, J., Hohmann, S. & Prior, B.A. Characterization of the osmotic-stress response inSaccharomyces cerevisiae: osmotic stress and glucose repression regulate glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase independently. Curr Genet 25, 12–18 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712960

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712960

Key words

Navigation