A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils

https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(78)90099-8Get rights and content

Abstract

A method is described for the rapid and objective estimation of the amount of carbon in the living, non-resting microbial biomass of soils. The method, which is based on the initial respiratory response of microbial populations to amendment with an excess of a carbon and energy source, was quantified using an expanded version of Jenkinson's technique.

The simultaneous application of the two methods to 50 soil samples showed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.96) between both. From this correlation it could be deduced that at 22°C, a substrate-induced maximal respiratory rate of 1 ml CO2· h−1 corresponds to c. 40 mg microbial biomass C. Evidence supporting these results was obtained from pure culture studies. The various soil types investigated were collected from agricultural as well as forest sites and they contained between 15 and 240 mg microbial C·100g dry soil−1. The respiratory method provides reproducible estimates of biomass size within 1–3 h after soil amendment. It can be combined without difficulty with a selective inhibition method for determination of bacterial and fungal contributions to soil metabolism.

References (31)

  • B.E. SöderstrÖm

    Vital staining of fungi in pure cultures and in soil with fluorescein diacetate

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1977)
  • J.P.E. Anderson et al.

    Quantification of bacterial and fungal contributions to soil respiration

    Arch. Mikrobiol.

    (1973)
  • J.P.E. Anderson et al.

    Measurement of bacterial and fungal contributions to respiration of selected agricultural and forest soils

    Can. J. Microbiol.

    (1975)
  • B.S. Ausmus

    The use of the ATP assay in terrestrial decomposition studies

    Bull. ecol. Res. Commun. (Stockh.)

    (1973)
  • L.A. Babiuk et al.

    The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil

    Can. J. Microbiol.

    (1970)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text